Beyond power asymmetry
The Shimen system as relational scaffolding for international doctoral students’ collective academic identity in China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/ptvk6864Keywords:
Shimen, international doctoral students, cross-cultural supervision, relational scaffolding, academic identity, ChinaAbstract
Existing research on cross-cultural doctoral supervision often prioritizes power asymmetries over supportive dynamics. This study examines China's Shimen system—a Confucian-rooted academic lineage—as a relational framework for international doctoral supervision. Using a phenomenological approach and semistructured interviews with 28 international doctoral students at Chinese universities, this research explores their lived experiences. The results show that Shimen serves as "relational scaffolding," offering academic guidance, emotional support, and a sense of collective belonging. This harmony-oriented structure effectively prevents identity alienation and fosters a collective academic identity. The findings challenge Western individualistic models by demonstrating how hierarchy and collectivism can serve as ethical support mechanisms. Ultimately, this study offers an indigenous theoretical framework and practical implications for developing inclusive, culturally informed supervisory practices in global higher education.
References
Ahmadi, R., & Weisi, H. (2024). A phenomenological inquiry into students’ research practice experiences in Iran’s higher education: special focus on supervisor-student relationships. Studies in Higher Education, 49(11), 1914–1927.
Bahtilla, M. (2022). Research supervision of international doctoral students: Perspectives of international students in two comprehensive universities in China. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 17, 181–199. https://doi.org/10.28945/4986
Baker, V. L., & Lattuca, L. R. (2010). Development networks and learning: Toward an interdisciplinary perspective on identity development during doctoral study. Studies in Higher Education, 35, 807–827.
Billot, J. (2010). The imagined and the real: Identifying the tensions for academic identity. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(6), 709–721.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
Dai, K., & Hardy, I. (2024). Contextualizing and hybridizing academic identity formation: An analysis of international returnees and locally trained scholars in China. Higher Education, 87(3), 567–583.
Dai, K., & Elliot, D. L. (2023). 'Shi men' as key doctoral practice: Understanding international doctoral students' learning communities and research culture in China. Oxford Review of Education, 49(1), 25–41.
Dai, K., & Hardy, I. (2021). The micropolitics of cultural change: A Chinese doctoral student’s learning journey in Australia. Oxford Review of Education, 47(2), 243–259.
Gao, Y. (2021). Understanding of international doctoral students’ challenges: A literature review study. Journal of International Students, 11(2), 505–513.
Geijsel, F., & Meijers, F. (2005). Identity learning: The core process of educational change. Educational Studies, 31(4), 419–430.
Guo, Y. (2025). Examining How Supervisor–Student Relationship Types Influence Depression in Doctoral Students: The Role of Mediating Mechanisms. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2025(1), 6254499.
Han, J., & Jin, L. (2025). Reconceptualizing supervisory relationships in graduate education: The role of interpersonal emotion regulation in supervisor-student interactions. International Journal of Educational Research, 132, 102650.
Henkel, M. (2000). Academic identities and policy change in higher education. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Kandiko Howson, C., Kinchin, I. M., & Gravett, K. (2022). Belonging in science: Democratic pedagogies for cross-cultural PhD supervision. Education Sciences, 12(2), 121.
Leibowitz, B., Ndebele, C., & Winberg, C. (2014). ‘It’s an amazing learning curve to be part of the project’: exploring academic identity in collaborative research. Studies in Higher Education, 39(7), 1256–1269.
Li, X. (2021). The China-centric era? Rethinking academic identity for sustainable higher education internationalization in China. International Journal of Chinese Education, 10(3).
Li, Y., Xu, W., & Chen, J. (2025). PhD student-supervisor relationship and its impacts: a perspective of the interpersonal relationship model. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1570137.
Liang, W., Liu, S., & Zhao, C. (2021). Impact of student-supervisor relationship on postgraduate students’ subjective well-being: a study based on longitudinal data in China. Higher Education, 82(2), 273–305.
Liu, L., & Dong, X. (2025). Family, enterprise, academic team? The influence of Shi-men culture on the academic aspirations of postgraduates in Chinese research universities. Higher Education Research & Development, 44(1), 123–138.
Löfström, E., Peltonen, J., Frick, L., Niglas, K., & Pyhältö, K. (2023). Profiles of doctoral students’ experience of ethics in supervision: an intercountry comparison. Higher Education, 86(3), 617–636.
Laufer, M., & Gorup, M. (2019). The invisible others: Stories of international doctoral students from Southeast Asia. Journal of International Students, 9(1), 42–59.
Mai Le, L., Pham, L., Kim, K., & Bui, N. (2021). The impacts of supervisor–PhD student relationships on PhD students’ satisfaction: A case study of Vietnamese universities. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 18(4), 1–16.
Manathunga, C. (2007). Supervision as mentoring: The role of power and boundary crossing. Studies in Continuing Education, 29(2), 207–221.
Marginson, S. (2022). Globalization in higher education: The good, the bad and the ugly. In F. Rizvi, B. Lingard, & R. Rinne (Eds.), Reimagining globalization and education (pp. 11–30). Routledge.
McLean, N., & Price, L. (2019). Identity formation among novice academic teachers–a longitudinal study. Studies in Higher Education, 44(6), 990–1003.
Mok, K. H., & Marginson, S. (2021). Massification, diversification and internationalisation of higher education in China. International Journal of Educational Development, 84, 102405.
Nordbäck, E., Hakonen, M., & Tienari, J. (2022). Academic identities and sense of place: A collaborative autoethnography in the neoliberal university. Management Learning, 53(2), 331–349.
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.
Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2022). Why does PhD students’ perceived supervisor support matter? Studies in Higher Education, 47(12), 2516–2530.
Pinto, S. (2024). International doctoral students’ perspectives on the qualities of supervisors: Expectations for intercultural supervision in Portuguese higher education. Research in Comparative and International Education, 19(1), 46–62.
Ringo, D. S. (2025). When relationships make a difference! Supervisor support and PhD students’ academic performance in the journey: the moderating effect of supervisor-student relationship quality. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2479403.
Robbins, S. P. (2009). Organisational behavior: Global and Southern African perspectives. Pearson South Africa.
Rogler, A., Wang, L., & Uematsu-Ervasti, K. (2026). Intercultural sensitivity as a pathway to support students' cultural competence and identity formation in virtual exchanges. Journal of International Students, 16(2), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.32674/tt2dv337
Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Columbia University Press.
Shimoyamada, S. (2026). Perceived learning outcomes of a short-term collaborative learning program: Toward developing intercultural competence and equitable Global North‒South partnerships. Journal of International Students, 16(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.32674/6rtaba49
Wang, L. (2019). Beijing Language and Culture University, China. In M. Byram & M. Stoicheva (Eds.), The Doctorate as Experience in Europe and Beyond: Supervision, Languages, Identities (pp. 145–162). Routledge.
Wang, L., & Byram, M. (2019). International doctoral students' experience of supervision: A case study in a Chinese university. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2018.1529736
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Xu, Y., & Liu, J. A. (2023). Exploring and understanding perceived relationships between doctoral students and their supervisors in China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–10.
Zheng, G., Cai, Y., & Zuo, B. (2024). Cultivating global scholars: Delving into Chinese doctoral students’ integration experiences at Finnish universities through an institutional logics’ lens. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(2), 7901–7926.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yu Huang, Shamillah Bano, Anding Shi, Zining Wang, Xiaoli Jing
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) [year] [author]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
