Bridging metacognition and performance
Writing-to-learn pedagogy and critical thinking development in an HBCU STEM context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/f5cqte11Keywords:
Critical Thinking , writing to learn , STEM Education, Writing-to-learn pedagogy, culturally responsive pedagogy, HBCU, pedagogyAbstract
This study investigates the efficacy of a Writing-to-Learn Pedagogy (WTLP) intervention in fostering critical thinking among underrepresented STEM students at an Historically Black College and University (HBCU). Utilizing Ennis’s (1987) taxonomy, the research employed a qualitative descriptive design to evaluate shifts in dispositions and abilities through reflective journaling and writing-to-explain within a hybrid industrial electricity course. Findings from two cohorts of 23 students revealed significant growth in analytical thinking, inquisitiveness, and confidence in reasoning. However, the generalizability of these findings is limited by the small sample size and single-institution design. Notably, the integration of structured learning plans bridged the gap between metacognitive awareness and applied problem-solving performance. This research provides empirical evidence for asset-based instructional strategies implemented within the distinctive context of HBCU STEM education, contributing to the preparation of a competent and diverse STEM workforce.
References
Akman, J., Bitting, K. S., & Merricks, J. A. (2026). Do community-based learning experiences in STEM encourage students from historically underrepresented backgrounds to pursue STEM? A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. Journal of Experiential Education, https://doi.org/10.1177/10538259261421544
Ayers, K. A., Happel-Parkins, A., Mohorn-Mintah, O., Retic, T., & Nordstrom, S. N. (2025). Persisting toward a career in biomedical research: A Black, male scientists’ becoming-scientist-with multiple spatial configurations. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.24-01-0025
Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 27(6), 12–26.
Barta, A., Fodor, I. A., Tamas, B., & Szamoskozi, I. (2022). The development of students critical thinking abilities and dispositions through the concept mapping learning method–A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 37, 100481.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Carney-Anderson, L. (2026). Reflective writing to promote metacognition in physiology Education. Current Opinion in Physiology, 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cophys.2026.100953
Derting, T. I., & Ebert-May, D. (2010). Learner-centered inquiry in undergraduate biology: Positive relationships with long-term student achievement. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9(4), 462–472.
Dickens, D., Jackson, D., Patrick, A., Younge, S., Shearin, S., Zheng, L., Mailk, M., Talley, J., & Stewart, L. (2025). Faculty perceptions of black students' experiences in STEM at HBCUs. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 26(3), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.63504/jstem.v26i3.2700
Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 9–26). W.H. Freeman.
Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.
Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2011). Writing to read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard Educational Review, 81(4), 710–744.
Hodges, A., Bryant, D., & Green, C. (2026). Enhancing STEM career pathways: Outcomes of a pre-professional workshop series at a historically black college. American Journal of STEM Education, 19, 21–36. https://doi.org/10.32674/5qsk2607
Jackson, P., Revelle, V., & Maiden, J. (2026). Lessons learned from replicating a graduate STEM mental health initiative at an Urban HBCU. American Journal of STEM Education, 20, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.32674/j249fq38
Jeon, A. J., Kellogg, D., Khan, M. A., & Tucker‐Kellogg, G. (2021). Developing critical thinking in STEM education through inquiry‐based writing in the laboratory classroom. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 49(1), 140–150.
Ke, J. (2025). Enhancing critical thinking skills through writing-to-learn pedagogy in STEM education. The Researcher, 31(3), 1–15.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
National Research Council. (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. The National Academies Press.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). Critical thinking: The nature of critical and creative thought. Journal of Developmental Education, 30(2), 34–35.
Pelaez, N. J. (2002). Problem-based writing with peer review improves academic performance in physiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 26(3), 174–184.
Phillips, H. N. (2023). Developing critical thinking in classrooms: Teacher responses to a Reading-for-Meaning workshop. Reading & Writing, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v14i1.401
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.
Rahmawati, A. S., Hamidah, I., Samsudin, A., & Rochintaniawati, D. (2025). Review of relevant literature about critical thinking skills in a science perspective. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(5), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i5.9687
Southworth, J. (2021). How argumentative writing stifles open-mindedness. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 20(2), 207–227.
Spencer, B. M. (2024). The academic, social, and psychological experiences of Black men enrolled in STEM undergraduate degree programs. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 37(9), 2637–2652. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2024.2318321
Straser, O., Bašić, M., Doorman, M., Weinberg, L., Kapelari, S., & Maaß, K. (2026). Fostering critical thinking in STEM education. Education Sciences, 16(3), 461. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16030461
Tarchi, C., Villalón, R., & Lamanda, E. (2022). Investigating the effect of actively-openminded thinking on source-based writing: a randomized control trial. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46.
The Institute for College Access & Success (TICAS). (2025). Mathematics, engineering, science achievement program report. https://ticas.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/TICAS_CA-STEM-MESA-Report-final.pdf
UNCF. (2023). Culturally relevant practice: Centering HBCUs and Black students. https://uncf.org/wp-content/uploads/Culturally-Relevant-Practice-FINAL.pdf
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2022). Employment in STEM occupations. U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/stem-employment.htm
Vaismoradi, M., Jones, J., Turunen, H., & Snelgrove, S. (2016). Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 6(5), 100–110.
Warschauer, M. (2006). Laptops and literacy: Learning in the wireless classroom. Teachers College Press.
Zarestky, J., Bigler, M., Brazile, M., Lopes, T., & Bangerth, W. (2022). Reflective writing supports metacognition and self-regulation in graduate computational science and engineering. Computers and Education Open, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100085
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jie Ke, Francis Tuluri, Wei Zheng

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) [year] [author]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Call for Special Issue Proposals 






