The silent language of connection
Nonverbal rituals in intercultural friendships at a Chinese university
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/82x7j075Keywords:
Intercultural friendship, nonverbal communication, ritual adaptation, international students, higher educationAbstract
This study examines how international and Chinese students at a Chinese university form intercultural friendships through nonverbal rituals, including silence, gift-giving, and shared meals. Using a qualitative ethnographic approach, the study draws on 50 interviews, six focus groups, and 120 hours of observation. The findings reveal that silence serves to manage emotions and maintain face, gift-giving acts as a nonverbal apology and connector, and shared meals create hybrid cultural spaces for mutual understanding. These nonverbal practices enable students to develop trust and resolve conflicts without relying on language. The study contributes to the development of intercultural competence by extending symbolic interactionism to encompass nonverbal communication and reinterpreting face negotiation theory through the lens of embodied interaction. The research introduces the concept of “third culture building,” suggesting that student-driven rituals are essential for fostering inclusive environments in higher education. The findings highlight the importance of informal interactions in cultivating intercultural relationships.
References
Anderson, K. A. (2023). Nonverbal communication as a mediator of intercultural communication in English as a second language classrooms. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2023.2262422 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2023.2262422
Arasaratnam, L. A., & Doerfel, M. L. (2005). Intercultural communication competence: Identifying key components from multicultural perspectives. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(2), 137–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2004.04.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2004.04.001
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. University of California Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chistyakov, D. I., & Chistyakova, O. V. (2020). Ritual as a means of intercultural communication. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Education, Language, Art, and Inter-Cultural Communication (ICELAIC 2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201215.350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201215.350
Dai, K., Hu, Y., Li, X., & Oladipo, O. (2023). Conducting doctoral research in China: An exploration of international students’ motivation to study at Chinese universities. Higher Education Research and Development, 42(5), 1133–1149. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2197195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2197195
Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306287002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306287002
Deardorff, D. K., & Arasaratnam-Smith, L. A. (2022). Developing intercultural competence in higher education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003229551 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003229551
Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Anchor Books.
Hashmi, M., & Waheed, M. (2020). Discerning goodness via nonverbal cues: Perspectives from high-context cultures. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 20(3), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v20i3.313 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v20i3.313
Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage.
Ivanova, P., Sun, Y., Li, W., & Bista, K. (2025). International students’ loneliness and social engagement. Journal of International Students, 15(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.32674/y6hw0n78 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32674/y6hw0n78
Lin, H., & Lou, L. (2024). A study on cross-cultural business communication based on Hofstede’s cultural dimensions theory. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 12(09), 352–368. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2024.129021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2024.129021
Liu, C., & Renn, K. A. (2024). Culturally responsive advising for international students. In D. K. Deardorff & L. A. Arasaratnam-Smith (Eds.), Developing intercultural competence in higher education (pp. 101–114). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46395-2_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46395-2_7
Lu, B., Shao, X., Ge, L., & Wu, J. (2024). Challenges and opportunities in implementing intercultural education in higher education: The perceptions and practice of foreign language teachers in a Chinese university. Language and Intercultural Communication, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2024.2425972 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2024.2425972
McSweeney, B. (2002). Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith - a failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55(1), 89–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726702551004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726702551004
Nakane, I. (2007). Silence in intercultural communication: Perceptions and performance. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.166
Oetzel, J., Ting-Toomey, S., Masumoto, T., Yokochi, Y., Pan, X., Takai, J., & Wilcox, R. (2001). Face and facework in conflict: A cross-cultural comparison of China, Germany, Japan, and the United States. Communication Monographs, 68(3), 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750128061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750128061
Peng, F., Kang, L., Shi, J., & Liu, M. (2023). Cultural distance, classroom silence and culturally responsive and inclusive education: Evidence from migrant college students in Shanghai. Behavioral Sciences, 13(3), 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13030193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13030193
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2017). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
Tang, L., & Zhang, C. (2023). Intercultural friendships with international students in China: Examining the role of intergroup contact, intercultural communication competence, host country nationals’ attitudes, and perceived intergroup threats. Behavioral Sciences, 13(10), 855. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13100855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13100855
Taras, V., Steel, P., & Stackhouse, M. (2023). A comparative evaluation of seven instruments for measuring values comprising Hofstede’s model of culture. Journal of World Business, 58(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101386 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101386
Target 4.7 | Sustainable development and global citizenship. (2016, August 10). UNESCO. Retrieved from https://gem-report-2016.unesco.org/en/chapter/target-4-7-sustainable-development-and-global-citizenship/
Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Intercultural conflict styles: A face-negotiation theory. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 213–235). Sage.
Zhu, Y., & Bresnahan, M. J. (2024). Chinese international students’ facework and collective face concerns in response to group criticism. Communication Quarterly, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2024.2420989 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2024.2420989
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of International Students

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) [year] [author]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0












