Examining the relationship between IELTS preparation and English language proficiency skills of international students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/rv7pqq16Keywords:
International Students, , English proficiency, Academic achievementAbstract
IELTS is a widely accepted English language proficiency test, required for academic and professional purposes. In this study, we examined the relationship between IELTS and the English proficiency skills of international students. We developed a proximal mediation model based on Bandura's triadic reciprocal determinism theory and tested it using covariance-based structural equation modeling. Data were collected through a survey of 275 international students preparing for IELTS to meet their academic requirements. The students reported that IELTS assessments significantly improved their English skills. They reported positive views of IELTS as an exam to enhance their language proficiency. Learning motivation for self-regulated learning and perceived self-efficacy for academic achievement served as two mediating factors that positively influenced the relationship between students' perceptions of IELTS and their English skills. Finally, the study analyzed the moderating effects of students' time management skills and found significant positive moderating effects.
References
Abdulwahed Ahmed Ismail, S. (2011). Exploring students’ perceptions of ESL writing. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n2p73
Adams, R. V., & Blair, E. (2019). Impact of time management behaviors on undergraduate engineering students’ performance. SAGE Open, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018824506
Agca, R. K., & Özdemir, S. (2013). Foreign language vocabulary learning with mobile technologies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 781–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.147
Ahmad, F., & Aziz, J. (2009). Students’ perception of the teachers’ teaching of literature communicating and understanding through the eyes of the audience. European Journal of Social Sciences, 7(3).
Akande, S. O., Oyeniyi, S., Kenneth, A., & Library, D. (2009). Knowledge, perception, and attitudes of library personnel toward preservation of information resources in Nigerian federal university libraries. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal). https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/303
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. The Health Psychology Reader, 94–106. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221129.N6
Bandura, A. (2024). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Psihologìâ ì Suspìlʹstvo, 37(2), 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
Benzie, H. J. (2010). Graduating as a “native speaker”: International students and English language proficiency in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 29(4), 447–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294361003598824
Bo, W. V., Fu, M., & Lim, W. Y. (2023). Revisiting English language proficiency and its impact on the academic performance of domestic university students in Singapore. Language Testing, 40(1), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322211064629
Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. A. (1990). Direct and indirect effects: Classical and bootstrap estimates of variability. Sociological Methodology, 20, 115–140.https://doi.org/10.2307/271084
Bonsaksen, T., Kottorp, A., Gay, C., Fagermoen, M. S., & Lerdal, A. (2013). Rasch analysis of the General Self-Efficacy Scale in a sample of persons with morbid obesity. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11(1), 1–11.https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-202
British Council. (2023). Why choose IELTS? Retrieved from https://www.britishcouncil.org
Carrión, G. C., Nitzl, C., & Roldán, J. L. (2017). Mediation analyses in partial least squares structural equation modeling: Guidelines and empirical examples. partial least squares path modeling: Basic Concepts, Methodological Issues and Applications, 173–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_8
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Davies, A. (2018). Assessing academic English language proficiency: Language testing reconsidered. 73–86. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1ckpccf.10
Dong, M., & Liu, X. (2022). Impact of learners’ perceptions of a high-stakes test on their learning motivation and learning time allotment: A study on the washback mechanism. Heliyon, 8(12), e11910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j, heliyon.2022.E11910
Dörnyei, Z. (2018). Motivating students and teachers. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0128
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Green, A. (2006). Washback to the learner: Learner and teacher perspectives on IELTS preparation course expectations and outcomes. Assessing Writing, 11(2), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2006.07.002
Guo, B., & Jiang, F. (2008). Self-efficacy theory and its application. Shanghai Educational Publishing House.
Hafrizal, H., Kasim, U., & Samad, I. A. (2021). Students’ perception toward English subject and their learning outcome. English Education Journal, 12(3), 476–494. https://doi.org/10.24815/eej.v12I3.19251
Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Pearson.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed., Pearson New International Edition). Pearson.
Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360
Hayes, B., & Read, J. (2004). IELTS test preparation in New Zealand: Preparing students for the IELTS academic module. Washback in Language Testing, 119–134. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410609731-15
Hayes, A.F. (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51, 335-337.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12050
Hazari, A. (2014). Learning Curve: student perceptions have an enormous impact on understanding. Retrieved from South China Morning Post: https://www.scmp.com/lifestyle/family-education/article/1407745/learning-curve-studentperceptions-have-huge-impact.
Hosseini, S. B. (2013). A study on the perception of Iranian candidates toward the general IELTS test. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications October 17–1309.
Huynh, [Initials]. (2022). Extensive reading on postgraduate students’ perceptions and its effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 2(4), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.22243
Impas, R. T., & Gempes, G. P. (2018). The moderating effect of time management on the relationship between quality of work life and personal effectiveness of junior high school teachers in Davao Region. International Journal of Management Excellence, 12(1).
In, J. (2017). Introduction of a pilot study. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 70(6), 601. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2017.70.6.601
Iqbal Amin Khan, Alam Zeb, Shabir Ahmad, & Rizwan Ullah. (2020). Relationship between university students’ time management skills and their academic performance. Review of Economics and Development Studies, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.26710/reads.v5I4.900
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
Krok, D., & Gerymski, R. (2019). Self-efficacy as a mediator of the relationship between meaning in life and subjective well-being in cardiac patients. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 7(3), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2019.89168
Li, H., Zhong, Q., & Suen, H. K. (2012). Students’ perceptions of the impact of the college English test. Language Testing in Asia, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.1186/2229-0443-2-3-77
Ma, H., & Chong, S. W. (2022). Predictability of IELTS in a high-stakes context: a mixed methods study of Chinese students’ perspectives on test preparation. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40468-021-00152-3
Mangal, S. K. (2016). General psychology. Sterling Publishing Private Limited.
Mata, M. N., Sohail, M., Haider, A., Martins, J. M., Sheraz, F., Rita, J. X., & Correia, A. B. (2021). The relationship between time management, work stress and work performance: A quantitative study in Portugal. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20(6), 1–11.
Meral, M., Colak, E., & Zereyak, E. (2012). The relationship between self-efficacy and academic performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1143–1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.264
Muluk, S., Zainuddin, Z., & Dahliana, S. (2022). Flipping an IELTS writing course: Investigating its impacts on students’ performance and attitudes. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(2), 591–612. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v.23314
Nushi, M., & Razdar, M. (2021). IELTS writing preparation course expectations and outcome: A comparative study of Iranian students and their teachers’ perspectives. Cogent Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1918853
Pan, X. (2020). Technology acceptance, technological self-efficacy, and attitude toward technology-based self-directed learning: Learning motivation as a mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 564294. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564294
Pearson, W. S. (2019). Critical perspectives on the IELTS test. ELT Journal, 73(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccz006
Pradanti, P., & Muqtada, Moh. R. (2023). Students’ perceptions on learning, motivation, and performance through project-based learning: undergraduate students’ case. Pythagoras: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidkan Matematika, 12(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.33373/pythagoras.v12I1.5011
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316
Purnama, N. A., Rahayu, N. S., & Yugafiati, R. (2019). Students’ motivation in learning English. Project (Professional Journal of English Education), 2(4), 539. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v2I4.P539-544
Rahimi, A. R. (2023). The role of EFL learners’ L2 self-identities, and authenticity gap on their intention to continue LMOOCs: insights from an exploratory partial least approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2202215
Rashid, A., Sharif, I., Khan, S., & Malik, F. (2020). Relationship between time management behavior and academic performance of university students. Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies, 6(4), 1497–1504. https://doi.org/10.26710/jbsee.v6i4.1481
Read, J. (2022). Test Review: The international English language testing system (IELTS). Language Testing, 39(4), 679–694. https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322221086211
Rerung, M. K. T. (2018). Students’ perception on blended learning in English listening and speaking class. Journal of English Language and Culture, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.30813/jelc.v9I1.1449
Poza, L. E., & Shannon, S. M. (2020). Where language Is beside the point: English language testing for Mexican students in the Southwestern United States. The Socio-Politics of English Language Testing, 46, 1–27.
Steinmayr, R., Weidinger, A. F., Schwinger, M., & Spinath, B. (2019). The importance of students’ motivation for their academic achievement-replicating and extending previous findings. Frontiers in Psychology, 464340. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01730
Stone, C. A., & Sobel, M. E. (1990). The robustness of estimates of total indirect effects in covariance structure models estimated by maximum. Psychometrika, 55(2), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02295291
Thumvichit, A., & Laoriandee, W. (2024). Evaluating English-medium instruction in higher education: EMI-QE. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101434
UNESCO. (2018). The global flow of tertiary-level students. Retrieved from http://uis.unesco.org/en/uis-student-flow
Wakamoto, N., & Rose, H. (2021). Learning to listen strategically: Developing a listening comprehension strategies questionnaire for learning English as a global language. System, 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102670
Wang, Y., Yasmin, F., & Akbar, A. (2023). Impact of the internet on English language learning among university students: mediating role of academic self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1184185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1184185
Wilson, R., Joiner, K., & Abbasi, A. (2021). Improving students’ performance with time management skills. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.18.4.16
Woolfolk, A. (2019). Educational Psychology, 14th Edn. Pearson.
Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 805-814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.805
Zahari, D. A., Dhayaalan, J., & Dhayaalan, J. (2016). The perception of Malaysian ESL tertiary level students on the IELTS Test. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522/2016.2.1/522.1.1.6
Zhang, J. (2021). A moderated mediation analysis of the relationship between a high-stakes English test and test takers’ extracurricular English learning activities. Language Testing in Asia, 11(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40468-021-00120
Zimmerman, B. J., & Pons, M. M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614–628. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312023004614
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of International Students

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) [year] [author]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0












