Preparing Students for Successful Online Intercultural Communication and Collaboration in Virtual Exchange
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v12iS3.4630Keywords:
Virtual Exchange ; Pedagogical Mentoring; Online Intercultural CommunicationAbstract
In the context of Virtual Exchange (VE) it is often assumed that participants will be naturally prepared to interact online successfully with their international partners. However, there is ample evidence in the literature to suggest that VE participants are usually unaware of effective communicative strategies in synchronous and asynchronous online communicative contexts. Through action research, this article investigates how teachers can provide scaffolding for both these communicative modalities in online intercultural environments. It reports on a qualitative content analysis of conversational and self-reported data from a corpus of three VEs that were collected and triangulated in order to identify when, in what areas, and in what ways students could benefit from pedagogical mentoring. The article then presents key mentoring stages and strategies that were identified and provides insight into the type of scaffolding that VE teachers can provide their students to help them achieve successful (a)synchronous online intercultural interaction.
References
Agar, M. (1994). The intercultural frame. International journal of intercultural relations, 18(2), 221-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(94)90029-9
Belz, J. A. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language learning & technology, 7(2), 68-117.
Belz, J. A., & Müller–Hartmann, A. (2003). Teachers as intercultural learners: Negotiating German–American telecollaboration along the institutional fault line. The modern language journal, 87(1), 71-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00179
Belz, J. A., & Vyatkina, N. (2008). The pedagogical mediation of a developmental learner corpus for classroom-based language instruction. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), 33-52. https://doi.org/10125/44154
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. SAGE.
Cavalari, S.M., & Aranha, S. (2019). The teacher's role in telecollaborative language learning: The case of institutional integrated teletandem. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-6398201913576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-6398201913576
Council of Europe (2020), Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion volume, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, available at www.coe.int/lang-cefr.
Çiftçi, E. Y. (2016). A review of research on intercultural learning through computer-based digital technologies. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 313-327.
Dooly, M. (Ed.). (2008). Telecollaborative language learning: A guidebook to moderating intercultural collaboration online. Peter Lang.
Dooly, M.A. (2011). Crossing the intercultural borders into 3rd space culture(s): Implications for teacher education in the twenty-first century. Language and Intercultural Communication, 11(4), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2011.599390 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2011.599390
Dooly, M. (2017). 12 Telecollaboration. The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning, 169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118914069.ch12
Dooly, M., & Vinagre, M. (2021). Research into practice: Virtual exchange in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444821000069
EVOLVE Project Team. (2020). The Impact of Virtual Exchange on Student Learning in Higher Education. EVOLVE Project publication.
Furstenberg, G. (2010). Making culture the core of the language class: Can it be done?. The modern language journal, 94(2), 329-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01027.x
Godwin-Jones, R. (2019). Telecollaboration as an approach to developing intercultural communication competence. Language Learning & Technology, 23(3), 8–28.
Guth, S., Helm, F., & O’Dowd, R. (2012). University language classes collaborating online. A report on the integration of telecollaborative networks in European universities.
Gutiérrez, B.F., Glimäng, M.R., O’Dowd, R., & Sauro, S. (2021). Mentoring handbook for virtual exchange teachers. Strategies to help students achieve successful synchronous and asynchronous online intercultural communication. Stevens Initiative. https://www.stevensinitiative.org/resource/mentoring-handbook-for-virtual-exchange-teachers/.
Helm, F. (2016). Facilitated dialogue in online intercultural exchange. In R. O’Dowd & T. Lewis (Eds.), Online intercultural exchange: Policy, pedagogy, practice (pp. 150– 172). New York, NY: Routledge.
Helm, F., & Van der Velden, B. (2021). Erasmus+ Virtual Exchange Impact Report 2020. Publications Office of the EU. https://europa.eu/youth/sites/default/files/eyp/eve/attachments/ec-01-21-404-en-n_final.pdf
Judd, T. (2018). The rise and fall (?) of the digital natives. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(5), 99-119. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3821 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3821
Kern, R. (2014). Technology as pharmakon: The promise and perils of the internet for foreign language education. Modern Language Journal, 98, 340–357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12065.x
Kramsch, C. (2014). Teaching foreign languages in an era of globalization: Introduction. Modern Language Journal, 98, 296– 311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12057.x
Kurek, M., & Müller-Hartmann, A. (2019). The formative role of teaching presence in blended Virtual Exchange. Language Learning & Technology, 23(3), 52–73.
Lee, L., & Markey, A. (2014). A study of learners’ perceptions of online intercultural exchange through Web 2.0 technologies. ReCALL, 26(3), 281-297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000111
O'Dowd, R., & Lewis, T. (Eds.). (2016). Online intercultural exchange: Policy, pedagogy, practice. Routledge.
Marull, C., & Kumar, S. (2020). Authentic language learning through telecollaboration in online courses. TechTrends, 64(4), 628-635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00488-2
Müller-Hartmann, A. (2012). The classroom-based action research paradigm in telecollaboration. Research methods for online interaction and exchange, 56-192.
Müller-Hartmann, A., & O’Dowd, R. (2017). A training manual on telecollaboration for teacher trainers. Retrieved June, 25, 2017.
Nissen, E. (2016). Combining classroom-based learning and online intercultural exchange in blended learning courses. In Online Intercultural Exchange (pp. 187-205). Routledge.
Norton, L. (2009). Action research in teaching and learning: A practical guide to conducting pedagogical research in universities. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203870433
O'Dowd, R. & Eberbach, K. (2004). Guides on the side? Tasks and challenges for teachers in telecollaborative projects. ReCALL, 16(1), 5-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344004000217
O'Dowd, R., & Waire, P. (2009). Critical issues in telecollaborative task design. Computer assisted language learning, 22(2), 173-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220902778369
O’Dowd, R. (2013). Telecollaboration and CALL. Contemporary computer-assisted language learning, 123-141.
O'Dowd, R. (2015). The competences of the telecollaborative teacher. The Language Learning Journal, 43(2), 194-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2013.853374
O’Dowd, R. (2018). Telecollaboration to virtual exchange: State-of-the-art and the role of UNICollaboration in moving forward. Journal of Virtual Exchange, 1. 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.jve.1
O’Dowd, R., Sauro, S., & Spector‐Cohen, E. (2020). The Role of Pedagogical Mentoring in Virtual Exchange. TESOL Quarterly, 54(1), 146–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.543
Prensky, M. (2015). Our new global empowered kids and how educators can help them. Educational Technology, Jul-Aug. 2015.
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
Sauro, S., & Chapelle, C. A. (2017). Toward langua-technocultural competence. The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning, 459-472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118914069.ch30
Stevens Initiative. (2019). Virtual exchange impact and learning report.Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38-67.
Ware, P. D., & Kramsch, C. (2005). Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. The Modern Language Journal, 89(2), 190-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00274.x
Ware, P. (2013). Teaching Comments: Intercultural Communication Skills in the Digital Age. Intercultural Education, 24(4), 315–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2013.809249
Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 308– 319). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of International Students
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All published articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License.
