Quality Evaluation of the Educational Services for International Students during the COVID-19
The Case of Universities in Shaanxi China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v12iS1.4606Keywords:
international students in China,, quality of educational services,, promotion policyAbstract
In this article, we report a survey study involving 582 international students studying at five universities in Shaanxi, China. Adopting a self-developed evaluation questionnaire, the survey explored the participants’ perceptions of educational services provided by their host universities during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results revealed medium to low levels of the participants’ perceived educational service quality, with the least favorable perceptions to the quality of the “communication with local students and faculty” and effectiveness of “help and support”. The research also found that gender, age, current location, scholarship, and length of the study programs in China significantly affected the participants’ perceptions of Chinese institutions’ educational service quality. Suggestions are proposed to further improve the quality of educational services to better support international students during the pandemic.
References
Abdullah, F. (2005). HEdPERF versus SERVPERF: The quest for ideal measuring instrument of service quality in higher education sector. Quality Assurance in Education, 13(4), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880510626584 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880510626584
Abdullah, F. (2006). The development of HEdPERF: A new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(6), 569–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00480.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00480.x
Brady, M., Cronin., J., & Brand, R. (2002). Performance-only measurement of service quality: a replication and extension. Journal of Business Research, 55(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0148-2963(00)00171-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00171-5
Brochado, A. (2007). Comparing alternative instruments to measure service quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education,17(2), 174–190.
Cronin, J., & Taylor, S. (1992). Measuring service quality: a re-examination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 55–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299205600304
https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880910951381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880910951381
Grönroos, C. (1982). An applied service marketing Theory. European Journal of Marketing, 16(7), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004859 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004859
Jain, S., & Gupta, G. (2004). Measuring service quality: SERVQUAL vs SERVPERF Scales. Vikalpa, 29(2), 25–37. http://doi.org/10.1177/0256090920040203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090920040203
Katiliūté, E., & Kazlauskien, I. (2010). The model of studies quality dimensions from student’s perception. Economics and Management, 15(1), 580–586.
Lehtinen, J.R., & Lehtinen, O. (1982). Service quality: a study of quality dimensions. unpublished working paper, Service Management Institute, Helsinki.
Oldfield, B., & Baron, S. (2000). Student perceptions of service quality in a UK university business and management faculty. Quality Assurance in Education, 8(2), 85–95. http://doi.org/10.1108/09684880010325600 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880010325600
O’Neill, M., & Palmer, A. (2004). Importance-performance analysis: A useful tool for directing continuous quality improvement in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 12(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880410517423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880410517423
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41–50. http:// doi.org/10.1177/002224298504900403 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298504900403
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.
Qureshi, M.I., Khan, K., Bhatti, M., Khan, A., & Zaman, K. (2012). Quality function deployment in higher education institutes of Pakistan. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 12(8), 1111–1118. https:// doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2012.12.8.1639
Shafiq, M., Lasrad, F., & Islam, A. (2018). Service quality scale development for higher education institutions: the Asian context. Journal of Quality and Technology Management, XV(1), 37–55.
杜婧, 段江飞, & 李绯. (2019). 侧重用户感知的在线教育服务质量模型研究.现代教育技术, 29(10), 74–79. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009- 8097.2019.10.011
马光秀, 沈瑜晨, & 杨珊珊. (2016). 关于在校留学生对高校的满意度研究调查-以江苏大学为例. 当代教育实践与教学研究（电子刊）, (12), 372–373. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-6711.2016.12.336
王艺鑫. (2020). 后疫情时代我国高校留学生教育发展的机遇与挑战. 高等理科教育,(5), 45–46. https:// doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-4076.2020.05.013
王升. (2009). 来华留学生教育学生满意度评价指标体系的构建-以河北省高校为例. 中国经贸导刊, (24), 116. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007- 9777.2009.24.091
许长青. (2017). 研究生教育服务质量评估及影响因素分析.高教发展与评估， (5), 30–49. https://doi.org/10.3963/j.issn.1672-8742.2017.05.004
余天佐, 韩映雄. (2013). 研究生教育服务质量管理的实证研究:基于SERVQUAL模型. 研究生教育研究, (1), 11–16. https://doi.org/ 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1663.2013.01.003
张庆堂, 曹伟. (2016). 学习者和管理者视角下现代远程教育服务质量评价体系研究.中国远程教育, (10): 44–50. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009- 458X.2016.10.006
钟贞山, 孙梦遥. (2016). 专业学位研究生教育服务质量满意度及改进策略的实证研究. 教育学术月刊, (5), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.16477/j.cnki.issn1674-2311.2016.05.010
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of International Students
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All published articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License.
