Talking to machines
How communication style shapes student engagement with AI tutors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/t2qnzc90Keywords:
AI literacy, Human-AI interaction, Qualitative content analysis, Atlas.ti, Higher education, Virtual tutor, STEM in EducationAbstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots become integral to higher education, this qualitative study explores how undergraduate students interact with them during business strategy tasks. Grounded in the Value-Based Adoption Model and utilizing ATLAS.ti for content and co-occurrence analysis, this study analyzes emotional tone and cognitive strategies in 15 student–AI conversations. Students who used a relational tone and followed up with questions demonstrated deeper critical thinking, whereas those who employed neutral tones and passive inquiries showed lower engagement. Co-occurrence analysis highlighted key patterns, such as neutral tone and simple inquiries. Findings suggest that socio-affective alignment in human–AI interaction fosters higher-order thinking, providing pedagogical insights into how AI integration can enhance both cognitive depth and emotional engagement in learning environments.
References
Al-Abdullatif, A. M., & Alsubaie, M. A. (2024). ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy. Behavioral Sciences, 14(9), 845. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090845
Alanezi, F. Z., Morrison, C. F., Wagner, R., Kelcey, B., & Miller, E. (2025). The effect of hot and cold debriefing on basic life support competence and reflection in undergraduate nursing students: A qualitative study. Nurse Education in Practice, 83, 104292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104292
Ayanwale, M. A., & Molefi, R. R. (2024). Exploring intention of undergraduate students to embrace chatbots: From the vantage point of Lesotho. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00451-8
Bibbi, Z., & Atta, A. (2024). The Role of ChatGPT as AI English Writing Assistant: A Study of Student’s Perceptions, Experiences, and Satisfaction. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 5(I). https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2024(5-I)39
Ding, L., Li, T., Jiang, S., & Gapud, A. (2023). Students’ perceptions of using ChatGPT in a physics class as a virtual tutor. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00434-1
Ghemawat, P. (2001). Distance still matters. The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 137-140.
Gill, S. S., Xu, M., Patros, P., Wu, H., Kaur, R., Kaur, K., Fuller, S., Singh, M., Arora, P., Parlikad, A. K., Stankovski, V., Abraham, A., Ghosh, S. K., Lutfiyya, H., Kanhere, S. S., Bahsoon, R., Rana, O., Dustdar, S., Sakellariou, R., … Buyya, R. (2024). Transformative effects of ChatGPT on modern education: Emerging Era of AI Chatbots. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 4, 19-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.06.002
González-González, C. S. (2023). El impacto de la inteligencia artificial en la educación: Transformación de la forma de enseñar y de aprender. Qurriculum. Revista de Teoría,Investigación y Práctica educativa, 36, 51-60. https://doi.org/10.25145/j.qurricul.2023.36.03
Hoey, E. M., & Kendrick, K. H. (2017). Conversational Analysis. En Research Methods in Psycholinguistics: A Practical Guide. Wiley.
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Kim, H.-W., Chan, H. C., & Gupta, S. (2007). Value-based Adoption of Mobile Internet: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 43(1), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.009
Kirk, H. R., Gabriel, I., Summerfield, C., Vidgen, B., & Hale, S. A. (2025). Why human–AI relationships need socioaffective alignment. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 728. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04532-5
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537-550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
Kong, S.-C., William, M. Ch., & Ghou, Z. (2023). Evaluating an Artificial Intelligence Literacy Programme for Developing University Students’ Conceptual Understanding, Literacy, Empowerment and Ethical Awareness. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 16-30.
Kosmyna, N., Hauptmann, E., Yuan, Y. T., & Situ, J. (2025). Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task.
Martins, L., Fernández-Ferrer, M., & Puertas, E. (2024). Analysing Conversation Pathways with a Chatbot Tutor to Enhance Self-Regulation in Higher Education. Education Sciences, 14(6), 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060590
Mollick, E., & Mollick, L. (2024, octubre 31). Stop Writing All Your AI Prompts from Scratch. Harvard Business Publishing Education. https://hbsp.harvard.edu/inspiring-minds/an-ai-prompting-template-for-teaching-tasks
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
Nguyen, A., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Huang, X. (2024). Human-AI collaboration patterns in AI-assisted academic writing. Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), 847-864. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2323593
Passonneau, S., & Coffey, D. (2011a). The Role of Synchronous Virtual Reference in Teaching and Learning: A Grounded Theory Analysis of Instant Messaging Transcripts. College & Research Libraries, 72(3), 276-295. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-102rl
Passonneau, S., & Coffey, D. (2011b). The Role of Synchronous Virtual Reference in Teaching and Learning: A Grounded Theory Analysis of Instant Messaging Transcripts. College & Research Libraries, 72(3), 276-295. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-102rl
Paulus, T., Woods, M., Atkins, D. P., & Macklin, R. (2017). The discourse of QDAS: Reporting practices of ATLAS.ti and NVivo users with implications for best practices. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(1), 35-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1102454
Rahman, M. K., Ismail, N. A., Hossain, M. A., & Hossen, M. S. (2025). Students’ mindset to adopt AI chatbots for effectiveness of online learning in higher education. Future Business Journal, 11(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00459-0
Rapp, A., Curti, L., & Boldi, A. (2021). The human side of human-chatbot interaction: A systematic literature review of ten years of research on text-based chatbots. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 151, 102630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102630
Strzelecki, A. (2024). Students’ Acceptance of ChatGPT in Higher Education: An Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Innovative Higher Education, 49(2), 223-245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-023-09686-1
Sulatko, S. (2024). Integrating Qualitative Content and Narrative Analysis: A Five-Step Approach. Academic Conferences International Limited.
Thimmanayakanapalya, S. S., Mulgund, P., & Sharman, R. (2025). A Discourse Structural Analysis Survey and Taxonomy for Chatbots. 17.
UNESCO. (2024). AI competency framework for students. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/JKJB9835
Usher, M., & Amzalag, M. (2025). From Prompt to Polished: Exploring Student–Chatbot Interactions for Academic Writing Assistance. Education Sciences, 15(3), 329. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030329
Villegas-Ch, W., Arias-Navarrete, A., & Palacios-Pacheco, X. (2020). Proposal of an Architecture for the Integration of a Chatbot with Artificial Intelligence in a Smart Campus for the Improvement of Learning. Sustainability, 12(4), 1500. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041500
Walter, Y. (2024). Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom: The relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3
Wang, B., Rau, P.-L. P., & Yuan, T. (2023). Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: Validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(9), 1324-1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2022.2072768
Yu, J., Lee, H., Ha, I., & Zo, H. (2017). User acceptance of media tablets: An empirical examination of perceived value. Telematics and Informatics, 34(4), 206-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.11.004
Call for Special Issue Proposals 
