Negotiating rankings and mobility
A comparative analysis of metric adaptation across four flagship universities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/bmfche03Keywords:
global university rankings, student mobility, metric adaptation, pluriversal validation, higher education governance, AI in educationAbstract
Global university rankings have evolved from informational tools into governing frameworks that shape institutional strategy and international student mobility, often reinforcing systemic inequities and epistemic. This study examines how four flagship universities — Tsinghua University (China), Jagiellonian University (Poland), Universidade Estadual Paulista (Brazil), and the University of Wisconsin-Madison (USA) — navigate ranking pressures while leveraging artificial intelligence to recalibrate mobility patterns. Using a comparative case design informed by Qualitative Comparative Analysis, the study integrates ranking data, policy documents, forty-five interviews, and digital engagement metrics spanning 2020–2025. Findings reveal four persistent tensions: prestige versus equity, cultural identity versus algorithmic homogenization, infrastructural constraints versus innovation, and regulatory sovereignty versus global integration. The analysis is theoretically anchored in contextual integrity, relational mobility, and pluriversal validation. Results indicate that metric adaptation is a negotiated political process in which elite institutions leverage rankings for global visibility while managing competing local imperatives. The study advocates for equity-oriented metrics, digital sovereignty investments, and participatory algorithmic governance as pathways toward inclusive and sustainable international student mobility.
References
Altbach, P. G., & de Wit, H. (2020). The challenge of global university rankings: An analysis of the current landscape and future prospects. Centre for Higher Education Management Systems.
Bennett, A., & Checkel, J. T. (Eds.). (2015). Process tracing: From metaphor to analytic tool. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9781107032117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858472
Blatter, J., & Haverland, M. (2012). Designing case studies: Explanatory approaches in small-N research. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137016669
Byrne, D., & Ragin, C. C. (Eds.). (2009). The SAGE handbook of case-based methods. Sage Publications. ISBN: 9781446201214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249413
Connell, R. (2019). The good university: What universities actually do and why it’s time for radical change. Zed Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.12605
Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2016). Engines of anxiety: Academic rankings, reputation, and accountability. Russell Sage Foundation.
Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137446671
Marginson, S. (2016). Higher education and the common good. Melbourne University Publishing.
Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001
Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. C. (Eds.). (2009). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Sage Publications. ISBN: 9781412942358 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569
Sassen, S. (2007). A sociology of globalization. W. W. Norton & Company.
Walsh, C. (2018). Pluriversal politics: The real and the possible. Duke University Press.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Journal Articles
Beech, S. E. (2015). International student mobility: The role of social networks. Social & Cultural Geography, 16(3), 332–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2014.983961 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2014.983961
Brooks, R., & Abrahams, J. (2023). The ethics of strategic compliance: University rankings and the moral economy of higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 77(3), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12450 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12450
Carroll, S. R., Garba, I., Figueroa-Rodríguez, O. L., Holbrook, J., & Lovett, R. (2020). The CARE principles for Indigenous data governance. Data Science Journal, 19(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-043
Chen, L., & O’Brien, K. (2023). Beyond the rankings: Regional retention strategies and the Wisconsin Framework. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 45(5), 521–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2023.2188907
Eden, M. (2021). Algorithmic exclusion in Midwestern higher education. Journal of Access & Equity, 2(1), 15–34.
Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1086/517897 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/517897
Fernández, R. (2024). Navigating global prestige and local mandate: UNAM’s dual strategy in rankings and student mobility. Latin American Education Review, 18(2), 45–67.
Floridi, L., & Taddeo, M. (2016). What is data ethics? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2083), 20160360. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0360
García, M., & Méndez, P. (2023). Social engagement as counter-metric: UDUAL’s challenge to global university rankings. Higher Education Policy, 36(4), 789–808. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-021-00250-8
Kosmützky, A., & Putty, R. (2023). Regional alternatives to global hierarchies? The rise of intra-Asian university networks and rankings. Studies in Higher Education, 48(1), 156–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2022.2044034
Lopez, J., & Rojas, A. (2023). Digital infrastructures and South–South mobility: Latin America’s adaptation strategies. International Journal of Educational Development, 95, 102681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102681 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102681
Nam, J., & Foley, D. (2025). Rankings as performative infrastructures: International student perceptions and decision-making. Journal of International Students, 15(2), 355–373. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v15i2.5432
Oldac, Y. I. (2023). Epistemic diversity and international student belonging: Rethinking pluriversality in mobility research. Journal of International Students, 13(3), 789–804. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v13i3.5433
Stevens, M., & Gebre-Medhin, J. (2022). Ranking regimes and global inequality in higher education. Sociological Theory, 40(3), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/07352751221109444
Taylor, B. J., & Cantwell, B. (2023). Market logics and the stratification of student mobility. Research in Higher Education, 64(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-022-09712-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-022-09712-9
Teichler, U. (2017). Internationalisation trends in higher education and the changing role of international student mobility. Journal of International Mobility, 5(1), 177–216. https://doi.org/10.3917/jim.005.0177 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/jim.005.0179
Xin, Y., Patel, S., & Demir, C. (2025). Artificial intelligence and international student recruitment: Opportunities and risks. Journal of International Students, 15(1), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v15i1.5434 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v15i1.5434
Yang, R. (2020). The East–West divide in global higher education: International student flows and institutional hierarchies. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 18(3), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2019.1703287
Zapp, M., & Ramirez, F. O. (2019). Beyond internationalisation: Rankings and the global higher education regime. Comparative Education, 55(3), 372–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2019.1612553 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2019.1638103
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sinaria Hassan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) [year] [author]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
