Exploring ethical considerations in machine translation
Addressing bias and cultural sensitivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/gs97fy88Keywords:
Ethical Consideration, Machine Translation, Cultural SensitivityAbstract
Through this paper, we aim to explore the ethical considerations related to machine translation, with a focus on eliminating bias and enhancing cultural sensitivity. By considering the experiences of individual participants, we aim to strengthen the ability of algorithms to adapt to diverse cultural environments, thereby contributing to the advancement of machine translation. Using partial least squares (PLS), we analyzed data from 5,000 participants, of whom 178 were specifically selected, to investigate the factors contributing to machine translation bias and overlooked cultural nuances. We explained the key determinants of machine translation bias and proposed solutions. This study provides practical suggestions for designing machine translation systems that are both ethical and culturally sensitive, which will directly affect developers, policymakers, and stakeholders in the translation field. This study employed PLS analysis to offer unique insights into ethical considerations, bias mitigation strategies, cultural sensitivity, and the interrelationships among users in machine translation. By drawing on personal experience, this paper contributes to the growth of machine translation’s popularity.
References
Afthanorhan, A., Awang, Z., & Aimran, N. (2020). Five common mistakes for using partial least squares path modeling (PLS-PM) in management research. Contemporary Management Research, 16(4), 255-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7903/cmr.20247
Attarian, R., & Hashemi, S. (2021). An anonymity communication protocol for security and privacy of clients in IoT-based mobile health transactions. Computer Networks, 190, 107976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2021.107976
Bartkowiak-Théron, I., McShane, A. L. J., & Knight, M. G. (2020). Departing from anonymous and quantitative student feedback: Fostering learning and teaching development through student evaluations. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 3(Sp. Iss. 1), 118-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.s1.16
Becker, J.-M., Cheah, J.-H., Gholamzade, R., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2023). PLS-SEM’s most wanted guidance. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(1), 321-346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2022-0474
Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., & Brunskill, E. (2021). On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258.
Broesch, T., Crittenden, A. N., Beheim, B. A., Blackwell, A. D., Bunce, J. A., Colleran, H., Hagel, K., Kline, M., McElreath, R., & Nelson, R. G. (2020). Navigating cross-cultural research: methodological and ethical considerations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 287(1935), 20201245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1245
Chuah, S. H.-W., Tseng, M.-L., Wu, K.-J., & Cheng, C.-F. (2021). Factors influencing the adoption of sharing economy in B2B context in China: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 175, 105892. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105892
Corciolani, M., Giuliani, E., Humphreys, A., Nieri, F., Tuan, A., & Zajac, E. J. (2022). Lost and found in translation: How firms use anisomorphism to manage the institutional complexity of CSR. Journal of Management Studies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12877
Costa-jussà, M. R., Cross, J., Çelebi, O., Elbayad, M., Heafield, K., Heffernan, K., Kalbassi, E., Lam, J., Licht, D., & Maillard, J. (2022). No language left behind: Scaling human-centered machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.04672.
Evans, D. R., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2020). Bifurcations and the emergence of L2 syntactic structures in a complex dynamic system. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 574603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574603
Farhad, A., Arkady, A., Magdalena, B., Ondřej, B., Rajen, C., Vishrav, C., Costa-jussa, M. R., Cristina, E.-B., Angela, F., & Christian, F. (2021). Findings of the 2021 conference on machine translation (WMT21). Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Machine Translation,
Fernandez Lynch, H. (2020). The right to withdraw from controlled human infection studies: justifications and avoidance. Bioethics, 34(8), 833-848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12704
Galehdar, N., Toulabi, T., Kamran, A., & Heydari, H. (2021). Exploring nurses' perception of taking care of patients with coronavirus disease (COVID‐19): A qualitative study. Nursing open, 8(1), 171-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.616
Gionchetti, E. (2022). Twitter, social corporate responsibility and economic performance: How multinational companies exploit social media.
Gupta, M., Parra, C. M., & Dennehy, D. (2022). Questioning racial and gender bias in AI-based recommendations: Do espoused national cultural values matter? Information Systems Frontiers, 24(5), 1465-1481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10156-2
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer Nature. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
Hovy, D., & Prabhumoye, S. (2021). Five sources of bias in natural language processing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 15(8), e12432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12432
Ibáñez, J. C., & Olmeda, M. V. (2022). Operationalising AI ethics: how are companies bridging the gap between practice and principles? An exploratory study. AI & SOCIETY, 37(4), 1663-1687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01267-0
Islam, T., Hussain, D., Ahmed, I., & Sadiq, M. (2021). Ethical leadership and environment specific discretionary behaviour: the mediating role of green human resource management and moderating role of individual green values. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de L'Administration, 38(4), 442-459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1637
Kasperė, R., Horbačauskienė, J., Motiejūnienė, J., Liubinienė, V., Patašienė, I., & Patašius, M. (2021). Towards sustainable use of machine translation: usability and perceived quality from the end-user perspective. Sustainability, 13(23), 13430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313430
Khan, A. G., Li, Y., Akram, Z., & Akram, U. (2021). Does bad gossiping trigger for targets to hide knowledge in morally disengaged? New multi-level insights of team relational conflict. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(9), 2370-2394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2021-0609
Kiritchenko, S., Nejadgholi, I., & Fraser, K. C. (2021). Confronting abusive language online: A survey from the ethical and human rights perspective. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 71, 431-478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.12590
Levinson, A. H., Crepeau-Hobson, M. F., Coors, M. E., Glover, J. J., Goldberg, D. S., & Wynia, M. K. (2020). Duties when an anonymous student health survey finds a hot spot of suicidality. The American Journal of Bioethics, 20(10), 50-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2020.1806374
Liang, P. P., Wu, C., Morency, L.-P., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2021). Towards understanding and mitigating social biases in language models. International Conference on Machine Learning,
McBride, O., Murphy, J., Shevlin, M., Gibson‐Miller, J., Hartman, T. K., Hyland, P., Levita, L., Mason, L., Martinez, A. P., & McKay, R. (2021). Monitoring the psychological, social, and economic impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic in the population: Context, design and conduct of the longitudinal COVID‐19 psychological research consortium (C19PRC) study. International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 30(1), e1861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wxe2n
Meena, A., Dhir, S., & Sushil, S. (2023). Coopetition, strategy, and business performance in the era of digital transformation using a multi-method approach: Some research implications for strategy and operations management. International Journal of Production Economics, 109068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.109068
Moorkens, J. (2022). Ethics and machine translation. Machine translation for everyone: Empowering users in the age of artificial intelligence, 18, 121.
Prates, M. O., Avelar, P. H., & Lamb, L. C. (2020). Assessing gender bias in machine translation: a case study with google translate. Neural Computing and Applications, 32, 6363-6381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04144-6
Ray, P. P. (2023a). Benchmarking, ethical alignment, and evaluation framework for conversational AI: Advancing responsible development of ChatGPT. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(3), 100136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100136
Ray, P. P. (2023b). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003
Riggs, R., Roldán, J. L., Real, J. C., & Felipe, C. M. (2023). Opening the black box of big data sustainable value creation: the mediating role of supply chain management capabilities and circular economy practices. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-03-2022-0098
Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Mitchell, R., & Gudergan, S. P. (2020). Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(12), 1617-1643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1416655
Rivera-Trigueros, I. (2022). Machine translation systems and quality assessment: a systematic review. Language Resources and Evaluation, 56(2), 593-619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-021-09537-5
Robinson, S. C. (2020). Trust, transparency, and openness: How inclusion of cultural values shapes Nordic national public policy strategies for artificial intelligence (AI). Technology in Society, 63, 101421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101421
Roche, C., Wall, P., & Lewis, D. (2023). Ethics and diversity in artificial intelligence policies, strategies and initiatives. AI and Ethics, 3(4), 1095-1115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00218-9
Sanderson, C., Douglas, D., Lu, Q., Schleiger, E., Whittle, J., Lacey, J., Newnham, G., Hajkowicz, S., Robinson, C., & Hansen, D. (2023). AI ethics principles in practice: Perspectives of designers and developers. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2023.3257303
Stahl, B. C., & Eke, D. (2024). The ethics of ChatGPT–Exploring the ethical issues of an emerging technology. International Journal of Information Management, 74, 102700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102700
Tomalin, M., Byrne, B., Concannon, S., Saunders, D., & Ullmann, S. (2021). The practical ethics of bias reduction in machine translation: Why domain adaptation is better than data debiasing. Ethics and Information Technology, 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-021-09583-1
Vieira, L. N., O’Hagan, M., & O’Sullivan, C. (2021). Understanding the societal impacts of machine translation: a critical review of the literature on medical and legal use cases. Information, Communication & Society, 24(11), 1515-1532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1776370
Vieira, L. N., O’Sullivan, C., Zhang, X., & O’Hagan, M. (2023). Machine translation in society: insights from UK users. Language Resources and Evaluation, 57(2), 893-914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-022-09589-1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jinfang Yao, Shaidatul Akma Adi Kasuma, Hisham Noori Hussain Al-Hashimy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.




