Helping international master’s students navigate dissertation supervision: Research-informed discussion and awareness-raising activities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v9i1.276Keywords:
dissertation writing, higher education, supervision, thesis writing, tutoring, academic supportAbstract
Drawing on a longitudinal case study of supervisees’ and supervisors’ experiences of master’s dissertation supervision in a U.K. university, we identify prominent themes and use excerpts from our data to design pedagogic activities to use in workshops with staff and students focused on supervisory practice. The activities ask workshop attendees to consider experiential supervisory narratives involving students’ social networks, problems interpreting supervisors’ feedback, problems with differing supervisor–supervisee role expectations, and problems with supervisor–supervisee miscommunication. Each scenario is followed by our literature-informed commentary. We argue that these empirically informed, grounded awareness-raising activities will alert supervisors and supervisees to common problems experienced during supervisory journeys, and will encourage them to consider their own supervisory expectations and practices more deeply.
References
Acker, S., Hill, T., & Black, E. (1994). Thesis supervision in the social sciences: Managed or negotiated? Higher Education, 28, 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383939
Aspland, T. (1999). “You learn round and I learn square”: Mei’s story. In Y. Ryan & O. Zuber-Skerritt (Eds.), Supervising postgraduates from non-English speaking backgrounds (pp. 25–39). Buckingham, United Kingdom: SRHE and Open University Press.
Blakeslee, A. M. (1997). Activity, context, interaction, and authority: Learning to write scientific papers in situ. Journal of Business & Technical Communication, 11, 125–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651997011002001
Brown, G., & Atkins, M. (1988). Effective teaching in higher education. London: Routledge.
Burns, R., Lamm, R., & Lewis, R. (1999). Orientations to higher degree supervision: A study of supervisors and students in education. In A. Holbrook & S. Johnston (Eds.), Supervision of postgraduate research in education (pp. 55–74). Coldstream, Victoria: Australian Association for Research in Education.
Delamont, S., Atkinson, P., & Parry, O. (2000). The doctoral experience: Success and failure in graduate school. London: Falmer Press.
Duff, P. A. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dysthe, O. (2002). Professors as mediators of academic text cultures: An interview study with advisors and master’s degree students in three disciplines in a Norwegian university. Written Communication, 19, 493–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/074108802238010
Gatfield, T. (2005). An investigation into PhD supervisory management styles: Development of a dynamic conceptual model and its managerial implications. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27, 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800500283585
Golde, C. (2010). Entering different worlds: Socialization into disciplinary communities. In S. K. Gardner & P. Mendoza (Eds.), On becoming a scholar: Socialization and development in doctoral education (pp. 79–95). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Grant, B., & Graham, A. (1994). “Guidelines for discussion”: A tool for managing postgraduate supervision. In O. Zuber-Skerritt & Y. Ryan (Eds.), Quality in postgraduate education (pp. 165–177). London: Kogan Page.
Grant, B. M. (2008). Agonistic struggle: Master–slave dialogues in humanities supervision. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 7, 9-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022207084880
Grant, B. M. (2010a). Fighting for space in supervision: Fantasies, fairytales, fictions and fallacies. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(3), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390500082483
Grant, B. M. (2010b). Improvising together: The play of dialogue in humanities supervision. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 9, 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022210379376
Green, B. (2005). Unfinished business: Subjectivity and supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 24, 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500062953
Guerin, C., Kerr, H., & Green, I. (2015). Supervision pedagogies: Narratives from the field. Teaching in Higher Education, 20, 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.957271
Halse, C. (2011). “Becoming a supervisor”: The impact of doctoral supervision on supervisors’ learning. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.594593
Harwood, N., & Petrić, B. (2017). Experiencing master’s supervision: Perspectives of international students and their supervisors. Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge.
Hockey, J. (1994). Establishing boundaries: Problems and solutions in managing the PhD supervisor’s role. Cambridge Journal of Education, 24, 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764940240211
Hockey, J. (1996). Strategies and tactics in the supervision of UK social science PhD students. Qualitative Studies in Education, 9, 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839960090409
Hockey, J. (1997). A complex craft: United Kingdom PhD supervision in the social sciences. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 2, 45–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596749700200004
Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 255–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90017-0
Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00038-8
Kleijn, R. A. M., de Bronkhorst, L. H., Meijer, P. C., Pilot, A., & Brekelmans, M. (2016). Understanding the up, back, and forward-component in master’s thesis supervision with adaptivity. Studies in Higher Education, 41, 1463–1479. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.980399
Kleijn, R. A. M., de Meijer, P. C., Brekelmans, M., & Pilot, A. (2015). Adaptive research supervision: Exploring expert thesis supervisors’ practical knowledge. Higher Education Research & Development, 34, 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934331
Krase, E. (2007). “Maybe the communication between us was not enough”: Inside a dysfunctional advisor/L2 advisee relationship. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6, 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.12.001
Kuwahara, N. (2008). It’s not in the orientation manual: How a first-year doctoral student learned to survive in graduate school. In C. P. Casanave & X. Li (Eds.), Learning the literacy practices of graduate school: Insiders’ reflections on academic enculturation (pp. 186–200). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049202
Lee, A. (2012). Successful research supervision: Advising students doing research. Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge.
Liu, L., Weiser, I., Silva, T., Alsup, J., Selfe, C., & Hawisher, G. (2008). It takes a community of scholars to raise one: Multiple mentors as key to my growth. In C. P. Casanave & X. Li (Eds.), Learning the literacy practices of graduate school: Insiders’ reflections on academic enculturation (pp. 166–183). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Manathunga, C. (2014). Intercultural postgraduate supervision: Reimagining time, place and knowledge. Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge.
McAlpine, L., Paulson, J., Gonsalves, A., & Jazvac-Martek, M. (2012). “Untold” doctoral stories: Can we move beyond cultural narratives of neglect? Higher Education Research & Development, 31(4), 511–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.559199
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2013). Education indicators in focus. Available at http://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/EDIF%202013--N°14%20
Paltridge, B. (2004). The exegesis as a genre: an ethnographic investigation. In L. J. Ravelli & R. A. Ellis (Eds.), Analysing academic writing: Contextualized frameworks (pp. 84–103). London: Continuum.
Salmon, P. (1992). Achieving a PhD—Ten students’ experience. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
Schneider, M. L., & Fujishima, N. K. (1995). When practice doesn’t make perfect: The case of a graduate ESL student. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 3–22). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Seloni, L. (2012). Academic literacy socialization of first year doctoral students in US: A micro-ethnographic perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 31, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.05.004
Starfield, S., & Ravelli, L.J. (2006). “The writing of this thesis was a process that I could not explore with the positivistic detachment of the classical sociologist”: Self and structure in New Humanities research theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 222–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.07.004
Taha, N., & Cox, A. (2016). International students’ networks: A case study in a UK university. Studies in Higher Education, 41, 182–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.927851
Todd, M. J., Smith, K., & Bannister, P. (2006). Supervising a social science undergraduate dissertation: Staff experiences and perceptions. Teaching in Higher Education, 11, 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510500527693
Turner, G. (2015). Learning to supervise: Four journeys. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52, 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.981840
UNESCO. (2016). Global flow of tertiary international students. Available at http://uis.unesco.org/en/uis-student-flow
Vehviläinen, S. (2009). Problems in the research problem: Critical feedback and resistance in academic supervision. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53, 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830902757592
Vilkinas, T. (2005). The supervisor’s role as manager of the PhD journey. In P. Green (Ed.), Supervising postgraduate research: Contexts and processes, theories and practices (pp. 163–177). Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
Zappa-Hollman, S. (2007). Academic literacy socialization of Mexican exchange students at a Canadian university (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of British Columbia.
Zappa-Hollman, S., & Duff, P. A. (2015). Academic English socialization through individual networks of practice. TESOL Quarterly, 49, 333–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.188
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All published articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License.
