Points, Points, and More Points: High School Grade Inflation and Deflation when Homework and Employability Scores are Incorporated
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/jsard.v6i1.3460Keywords:
standards-based, grading, inflation, deflation, standards-based gradingAbstract
With a strong movement of schools starting to use standards-based grading practices, one of the aims of this study was to learn if traditional grading practices communicate grades that are accurate based on the students’ learning of the course objectives. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which employability and homework scores within a traditional points- and percentages-weighted grading model inflates or deflates grades. This study analyzed 795 students’ semester math grades at an urban high school to see if, and to what extent, students’ grades were inflated or deflated due to including homework and employability scores in the grade. Final grades, which included homework and employability points, were compared to each student’s overall summative assessment scores to determine grade inflation or deflation. The study also analyzed how changing grading practices to eliminate homework and employability points would impact the number of students that ultimately passed or failed the course. Results of this study indicated 336 (43.2%) students had their grades inflated or deflated by 5% or more and 97 (12.6%) students had their grades inflated or deflated by 10% or more, which is equivalent to moving up or down a full letter grade. School leaders should consider separately communicating academic and non-academic factors to minimize grade inflation/deflation in order to make decisions based upon grades more justifiable.
Downloads
References
Allen, J. D. (2005). Grades as valid measures of academic achievement of classroom learning. The Clearinghouse, 78(5), 218-223.
Allensworth, E. M., & Clark, K. (2020). High school GPAs and ACT scores as predictors of college completion: Examining assumptions about consistency across high schools. Educational Researcher, 49(3), 198-211.
Anagnostopoulos, D. (2003). The new accountability, student failure, and teachers' work in urban high schools. Educational Policy, 17(3), 291-316.
Bailey, J., & McTighe, J. (1996). Reporting achievement at the secondary level: What and how. ASCD-yearbook, 119-140.
Belasco, A. S., Rosinger, K. O., & Hearn, J. C. (2015). The test-optional movement at America’s selective liberal arts colleges: A boon for equity or something else? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(2), 206-223.
Brookhart, S. M. (1991). Grading practices and validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10(1), 35-36.
Brookhart, S. M. (2004). Grading. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Brookhart, S. M., Guskey, T. R., Bowers, A. J., McMillan, J. H., Smith, J. K., Smith, L. F., Stevens, M. T., & Welsh, M. E. (2016). A century of grading research: Meaning and value in the most common educational measure. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 803-848.
Brookhart, S. M., Guskey, T. R., McTighe, J., & Wiliam, D. (2020). Eight essential principles for improving grading. Educational Leadership, 78(1). Online exclusive.
Camara, W., Kimmel, E., Scheuneman, J., Sawtell, E. A. (2003). Whose grades are inflated? (Research Report No. 2003-4). New York, NY: College Board.
Carr, P. C. (2004). The NAEP high school transcript study. Education Statistics Quarterly, 6, 4-5.
Cooper, H. (1994). Homework research and policy: A review of the literature. Research/Practice, 2(2), 1-10.
DiMaggio, P. (1982). Cultural capital and school success: The impact of status culture participation on the grades of U. S. high school students. American Sociological Review, 47(2), 189–201.
Feldman, J. (2018). Grading for equity: What it is, why it matters, and how it can transform schools and classrooms. Corwin Press.
Frankin, A., Buckmiller, T., & Kruse, J. (2016). Vocal and vehement: Understanding parents’ aversion to standards-based grading. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 4(11), 19-29.
Fried, R. (2005). The game of school: Why we play it, how it hurts kids, and what it will take to change it. Jossey-Bass.
Galla, B. M., Shulman, E. P., Gardner, M., Hutt, S. J., Goyer, J. P., D’Mello, S. K., Finn, A. S., Duckworth, A. L. (2019). Why high school grades are better predictors of on-time college graduation than are admissions test scores: The roles of self-regulation and cognitive ability. American Educational Research Journal, 56(6), 2077-2115.
Gershenson, S. (2018). Grade inflation in high schools (2005–2016). Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
Godfrey, K. (2011). Investigating grade inflation and non-equivalence (Research Report 2011-2). New York, NY: College Board.
Guskey, T. R. (1994). Making the grade: What benefits students. Educational Leadership, 52(2), 14-20.
Guskey, T. R. (2009). Bound by tradition: Teachers’ views on crucial grading and reporting issues. Online submission.
Guskey, T. R., & Link, L. J. (2019). Exploring the factors teachers consider in determining students’ grades. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(3), 303-320.
Guskey, T. R. (2020). Breaking up the grade. Educational Leadership, 78(1), 40-46.
Iowa Department of Education. (2015). 2015-2016 Iowa public school district PreK-12 enrollments by district, grade, race and gender. Accessed 8 February 2020, https://educateiowa.gov/documents/public-district/2018/07/2015-2016-iowa-public-school-district-prek-12-enrollements-district
Jussim, L. (1991). Grades may reflect more than performance: Comment on Wentzel (1989). Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 153–155. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.153
Keith, T. Z., Keith, P. B., Quirk, K. J., Sperduto, J., Santillo, S., & Killings, S. (1998). Longitudinal effects of parent involvement on high school grades: Similarities and differences across gender and ethnic groups. Journal of School Psychology, 36(3), 335–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(98)00008-9
Knight, M. & Cooper, R. (2019). Taking on a new grading system: The interconnected effects of standards-based grading on teaching, learning, assessment, and student behavior. NASSP Bulletin, 103(1), 65-92.
Kunnath, J. (2017a). Creating meaningful grades. Journal of School Administration Research and Development, 2(1), 53-56.
Kunnath, J. (2017b). Teacher grading decisions: Influences, rationale, and practices. American Secondary Education, 45(3), 68-88.
Lichty, J. A., & Retallick, M. S. (2017). Iowa agricultural educators’ current and perceived grading practices. Journal of Research in Technical Careers, 1(1), 11.
Marzano, R., & Heflebower, T. (2011). Grades that show what students know. Educational Leadership, 69(3), 34-39.
McMillan, J. H. (2001). Secondary teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practices. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(1), 20-32.
McMillan, J. (2018). Surveys of teachers’ grading practices and perceptions. In T. R. Guskey and S. M. Brookhart (Eds.), What do we know about grading: What works, what doesn't, and what's next (pp. 113-144). ASCD.
Merchant, S., Klinger, D., & Love, A. (2018). Assessing and reporting non-cognitive skills: A cross-Canada survey. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 187.
Muñoz, M. A. & Guskey T.R. (2015). Standards-based grading and reporting will improve education. Phi Delta Kappan, 96(7), 64-68.
Noddings, N. (2005). What does it mean to educate the whole child? Educational Leadership, 63(1), 8-13.
O’Connor, K. (2009). Reforming grading practices in secondary schools. Principal’s Research Review, 4(1), 1-7.
Ornstein, A. C. (1994). Grading practices and policies: An overview and some suggestions. NASSP Bulletin 78(561), 55-64.
Pattison, E., Grodsky, E., & Muller, C. (2013). Is the sky falling? Grade inflation and the signaling power of grades. Educational Researcher, 42(5), 259-265.
Pope, J. (2006, November 18). Admissions boards face “grade inflation.” The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/18/AR2006111800473_pf.html
Reeves, D. B. (2008). Leading to change/effective grading practices. Educational Leadership, 65(5), 85.
Reeves, D., Jung, L. A., & O’Connor, K. (2017). What’s worth fighting against in grading? Educational Leadership, 74(8), 42-45.
Resh, N. (2009). Justice in grades allocation: Teachers’ perspective. Social Psychology of Education, 12, 315-325.
Roscigno, V. J., & Ainsworth-Darnell, J. W. (1999). Race, cultural capital, and educational resources: Persistent inequalities and achievement returns. Sociology of Education, 158-178.
Rubin, P. G., & González Canché, M. S. (2019). Test-flexible admissions policies and student enrollment demographics: Examining a public research university. The Review of Higher Education, 42(4), 1337-1371.
Russell, J. A., & Austin, J. R. (2010). Assessment practices of secondary music teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 58(1), 37-54.
Townsley, M. (2018). Mastery-minded grading in secondary schools. School Administrator, 75(2), 16-21.
Townsley, M., Buckmiller, T., & Cooper, R. (2019). Anticipating a second wave of standards-based grading implementation and understanding the potential barriers: Perceptions of high school principals. NASSP Bulletin, 103(4), 281-299.
Vatterott, C. (2011). Making homework central to learning. Educational Leadership, 69(3), 60-64.
Wentzel, K. R. (1989). Adolescent classroom goals, standards for performance, and academic achievement: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.131
Woodruff, D. J., & Ziomek, D. L. (2004). Differential grading standards among high schools (ACT Research Report Series 2004-2). Iowa City, IA: ACT.
Wormeli, R. (2011). Redos and retakes done right. Educational Leadership, 69(3), 22-26.
Zhang, Q., & Sanchez, E. I. (2013). High school grade inflation from 2004 to 2011. (ACT Research Report Series 2013-2). Iowa City, IA: ACT.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of School Administration Research and Development
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All published articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License.
.png)
