Leadership for inclusive academic integration

Perspectives on computer science curriculum design

Authors

  • Radka Nacheva University of Economics – Varna, Bulgaria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32674/bst81114

Keywords:

computer science education, leadership, student leader, business simulation learning, student motivation

Abstract

Educational institutions should promote student entrepreneurship to foster personal growth, skill development, and social change. By employing collaborative learning strategies that develop leadership and entrepreneurial skills, teachers can improve this. In addition to introducing a business simulation-based learning approach to encourage academic motivation, leadership development, and creative thinking, this paper examines the importance of student leadership in computer science education. This approach, which emphasizes cooperation, was tested with 136 computer science students at a Bulgarian university. The results showed that teamwork and listening skills were more important to students than technical knowledge. The findings imply that business simulations provide a useful setting for developing the technical and leadership abilities essential to the technology industry.

Author Biography

  • Radka Nacheva, University of Economics – Varna, Bulgaria

    RADKA NACHEVA, PhD, is a Chief Assistant Professor in the Department of Informatics, University of Economics – Varna, Bulgaria.  Her major research interests lie in the area of human-computer interaction, including user-oriented design, user experience, software usability and accessibility; e-learning and m-learning; social media; and the cognitive part of human-computer communication problems (e.g., emotions analysis and users’ mental models). Since 2009, Radka has been teaching in the field of computer science (operating systems, web design and technologies, UX design, e-business, object-oriented modeling, business process modeling).  Email: r.nacheva@ue-varna.bg

References

Alstete, J.W. (2023). Multiplying success: the power of multiple simulations with graduated weighting and coordinated sequencing for learner engagement. Journal of International Education in Business, 16(3), pp. 334–350. https://doi.org/10.1108/jieb-04-2023-0018.

Barbaroux, P. (2022) 'Développer les compétences de leadership par la simulation : un cadre de recherche et une étude de cas interprétative,' Management International, 26(1), p. 192. https://doi.org/10.7202/1088443ar.

Bauer, E., Heitzmann, N., & Fischer, F. (2022). Simulation-based learning in higher education and professional training: Approximations of practice through representational scaffolding. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 75, id:101213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101213

Biggs, J. B. (1993). From theory to practice: A cognitive systems approach. Higher Education Research & Development, 12(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436930120107

Bradford, S., Rutherford, B., and Friend, S. (2017). The impact of training, mentoring and coaching on personal learning in the sales environment. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 15(1), 133-158.

Cadotte, E.R. (2022). How to use simulation games in the classroom? The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 31(2_suppl), pp. S90–S134. https://doi.org/10.1177/09713557221107442.

Caillier, James. 2020. Testing the influence of autocratic leadership, democratic leadership, and public service motivation on citizen ratings of an agency head’s performance. Public Performance & Management Review 43: 918–41

Carli, L., & Eagly, A. (2018). Leadership and gender. In The Nature of Leadership ( Third Edition ed., pp. 244-271). SAGE Publications, Inc, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506395029

Chukwusa, J. (2019). Autocratic leadership style: Obstacle to success in academic libraries. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1-10.

Costa, J., Pádua, M., and Moreira, A.C. (2023). Leadership Styles and Innovation Management: What Is the Role of Human Capital? Administrative Sciences, 13(2), id:47. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13020047

David Phelps and Rafi Santo. 2021. Student Leadership, Systems Change: Opportunities and Tensions for Youth Impact on District-Wide Computer Science Initiatives. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 21, 4, Article 32 (December 2021), 39 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461716

Davidson, F.D. and Hughes, T.R. (2020). Moral dimensions of leadership. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.785.

Dobrev, D. (2024). “European” Leadership. Conference Proceedings of International Scientific-Practical Conference Human Resource Management, Varna: Science and Economics Publishing House, 114-120.

Dyczkowska, Joanna, and Tomasz Dyczkowski. 2018. Democratic or autocratic leadership style? Participative management and its links to rewarding strategies and job satisfaction in SMEs. Athens Journal of Business & Economics 4: 193–218.

Ekayani, N.W.D. et al. (2023). Integration Of Leadership Training In The Medical And Health Profession Education Curricula. Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia the Indonesian Journal of Medical Education, 12(1), p. 102. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.75890.

Faisal, N., Chadhar, M., Goriss-Hunter, A., Stranieri, A. (2022). Business Simulation Games in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Empirical research. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2022, pp. 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1578791.

Falloon, G. (2019) 'From simulations to real: Investigating young students’ learning and transfer from simulations to real tasks,' British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), pp. 778–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12885.

Galan-Muros, V. and Davey, T. (2019). The UBC ecosystem: putting together a comprehensive framework for university-business cooperation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(4), pp. 1311-1346.

Guay, F., Vallerand, R., and Blanchard, C. (2000). On the Assessment of Situational Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion, 24(3), 175-213.

Hadziahmetovic, N., Tandir, N. and Dzambic, A. (2023). A research review of leadership styles. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 12(1), 188-206. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarems/v12-i1/15799.

Harms, P. D., Wood, D., Landay, K., Lester, P. B., and Lester, G. V. (2018). Autocratic leaders and authoritarian followers revisited: A review and agenda for the future. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 105-122.

Hennicke, M. et al. (2023). Leadership simulations as a teaching and learning tool at universities: A single-player example. Zeitschrift FüR Hochschulentwicklung, 18(Sonderheft Planspiele), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.21240/zfhe/sh-ps/14.

Hunter, J. (2004). The World's Most Powerful Leadership Principle. New York: Crown Business.

Hwang, J.H. (2023b) 'Effects of Simulation-Based Practice Education on learning satisfaction, immersion, and Self-Efficacy of nursing students,' Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 12(1), p. 275. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v12n1p275.

Jaqua, E. and Jaqua, T. (2021). Transactional leadership. American Journal of Biomedical Science & Research, 14(5), 399–400. https://doi.org/10.34297/ajbsr.2021.14.002021.

Kapur, R. (2022). Leadership Management And Development In Organizations. International Journal of Information, Business and Management, 14(2), 47-57.

Khan, H., Rehmat, M., Butt, T.H. et al. Impact of transformational leadership on work performance, burnout and social loafing: a mediation model. Futur Bus J 6, 40 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-020-00043-8

Kjellström, S., Stålne, K. and Törnblom, O. (2020). Six ways of understanding leadership development: An exploration of increasing complexity. Leadership, 16(4), pp. 434–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715020926731.

Klein, G., & Delegach, M. (2023). Charismatic Leadership Is Not One Size Fits All: The Moderation Effect of Intolerance to Uncertainty and Furlough Status During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 30(3), 297-313. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518231176231

Kozirog, K., Lucaci, S.M., Berghmans, S. (2022). Universities as key drivers of sustainable innovation ecosystems. European University Association. [online] Available at: https://www.eua.eu/downloads/publications/innovation%20report.pdf [Accessed 20 October 2024].

Lovin, D.; Raducan, M.; Capatina, A.; Cristache, N. Sustainable Knowledge Transfer from Business Simulations to Working Environments: Correlational vs. Configurational Approach. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2154. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042154

Moranya, G., Reynolds, C., and Gannon, N. (2018). Developing a Business Simulation Game to Improve Student Engagement with Accounting Theory. All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (AISHE-J), 10(2), 3311-33113.

Muhannaa, M. (2023). Ethical Leadership Dimensions And Their Relationships With Job Satisfaction And Organizational Commitment. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 7(11), 20-36.

Musaigwa, M. (2023). The role of leadership in managing change. International Review of Management and Marketing, 13(6), pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.13526.

Nakamura, Y.T. and Milner, J. (2023) 'Inclusive leadership via empathic communication,' Organizational Dynamics, 52(1), p. 100957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2023.100957.

Northouse, P. G. (2019). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.

Pascal Brassier, Véronique Favre-Bonté, Patrick Ralet. The Impact of collective Pre-game Organization in the perceived Experience of Digital Management Simulations in Higher Education. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review , In press. hal-04629068 https://uca.hal.science/hal-04629068

Plutchik, R. (1980). A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion. In: Plutchik, R., Kellerman, H. (eds.) Emotion: Theory, Research, and Experience, Academic Press Cambridge, vol. 1, pp. 3–31.

Rammstedt, B. & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10 item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 203‐212.

Rinkinen, S., Konsti-Laakso, S. and Lahikainen, K. (2023). University as an opportunity space enabler in a regional entrepreneurial ecosystem. European Planning Studies, 32(5), pp. 1010–1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2023.2246522.

Ross S. Simulation-Based Learning: From Learning Theory to Pedagogical Application. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice. 2021 Oct 01;19(4), Article 15.

Samadi-Parviznejad, P. (2021). Simulation of Sales Scenarios in Chain Store Marketing with a Futuristic Approach. International Journal of Innovation in Marketing Elements, 1(1), pp. 7–17. https://doi.org/10.59615/ijime.1.1.7.

Scandura, T.A. and Meuser, J.D. (2021). Relational Dynamics of Leadership: Problems and Prospects. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 9(1), pp. 309–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091249.

Shen, Y., Chou, W., Schaubroeck, J., and Liu, J. (2023). Benevolent leadership, harmonious passion, and employee work behaviors: A multi-level moderated mediation model. Journal of Business Research, 157, id:113571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113571.

Tijssen, R., Edwards, J. and Jonkers, K. (2021) Regional Innovation impact of Universities. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839100536.

Tong, L.K. et al. (2024). The effects of simulation-based education on undergraduate nursing students’ competences: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. BMC Nursing, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02069-7.

Udin, U. (2023). Leadership styles and their associated outcomes: A bibliometric review using VOSviewer. International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management, 8(4), 443-456.

United Nations. (2022). SDGS Youth Leadership and Social Responsibility Education. Retrieved from: https://sdgs.un.org/partnerships/sdgs-youth-leadership-and-social-responsibility-education (accessed 12 July 2024).

Zamiri, M. and Esmaeili, A. (2024). Strategies, Methods, and Supports for Developing Skills within Learning Communities: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Administrative Sciences, 14(9), p. 231. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14090231.

Zasa, F., Buganza, T. (2023). Developing a shared vision: strong teams have the power. Journal of Business Strategy, 44(6), pp. 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1108/jbs-04-2022-0065.

Zhang J, Wang Y and Gao F (2023) The dark and bright side of laissez-faire leadership: Does subordinates’ goal orientation make a difference? Front. Psychol. 14:1077357. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1077357

Zoroja, J., Bach, M.P. and Miloloza, I. (2019). Developing Leadership in a Simulation-Games Environment. 42nd International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.23919/mipro.2019.8756993.

Additional Files

Published

2026-02-23

How to Cite

Nacheva, R. (2026). Leadership for inclusive academic integration: Perspectives on computer science curriculum design. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 15(1), 95-132. https://doi.org/10.32674/bst81114