Initiating School Improvement
An Analysis of Improvement Priorities Issued by the Kentucky Department of Education
Keywords:
school improvement, school administration, improvement priorities, Kentucky Department of EducationAbstract
In the United States, state education agencies (SEAs) are required to regularly identify low performing schools. Initiating the school improvement process is one of the most important, yet most challenging steps. The Kentucky Department of Education (KDE) has been nationally recognized the way it initiates the school improvement process. This study seeks to distill findings from 476 suggested first steps issued by the KDE to create action statements that a school leader could use when initiating school improvement on their own.School improvement audit reports were accessed from the KDE. Four hundred seventy six school improvement priorities (IPs) were coded using a two-tier conceptual coding protocol to distil IPs into essential improvement priorities (EIPs) that reflect the steps required to initiate school improvement.The coding protocol yielded 38 EIPs divided among eight themes. The most frequently assigned EIP relates the deployment of a consistent improvement process with the second most frequently assigned EIP being related to the establishment of a school-wide instructional process.Leaders of school with declining performance may use the EIPs identified by this study to inform their improvement efforts as they seek to enhance teaching and learning conditions in their school.
Downloads
References
KAR 5:280. School improvement procedures. Commonwealth of Kentucky.
Aldridge, J.M., Rijken, P.E., & Fraser, B.J. (2021). Improving Learning Environments through Whole-School Collaborative Action Research. Learning Environments Research, 24(2). 183-205. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09318-x
American Institutes for Research (2010). School Restructuring: What works when. A Guide for Education Leaders. Ed. 3. American Institutes for Research.
Baroody, K. (2011). Turning Around the Nation’s Lowest-Performing Schools: Five steps districts can take to improve their chances of success. The Center for American Progress, Washington, D.C.
Bose, S., & Brauckmann-Sajkiewicz, S. (2021). (In)effective Leadership? Exploring the Interplay of Challenges, Goals and Measures in the Context of School Improvement. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(4). 454-471. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2020-0162
Calkins, A., Guenther, W., Belfiore, G., & Lash, D. (2007). The Turnaround Challenge: Why America’s best opportunity to dramatically improve student achievement lies in our worst-performing schools. Mass Insight Education & Research Institute, Boston, M.A.
Cognia. 2020. AdvancED Performance Standards for Schools. Advance Education, Inc.
Council of Chief State School Officers. (2017). CCSSO Principles of Effective School Improvement Systems. Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington, DC.
Dolph, D. (2017). Challenges and Opportunities for School Improvement: Recommendations for Urban School Principals. Education and Urban Society, 49(4). 363-387. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013124516659110
Downes, J.M., Bishop, P.A., Swallow, M., Olosfon, M., & Hennessey, S. (2016). Collaborative Action Research for Middle Grades Improvement. Educational Action Research, 24(2). 194-215. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1058169
Every Student Succeeds Act, 20 U.S.C. § 6301. (2015). https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/1177
Fløvik, L., Knardahl, S., & Christensen, J.O. (2019). The Effect of Organizational Changes on the Psychosocial Work Environment: Changes in Psychological and Social Working Conditions Following Organizational Changes. Frontiers in Psychology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02845
Hallinger, P & Heck, R.H., (2011). Exploring the Journey of School Improvement: Classifying and Analyzing Patterns of Change in School Improvement Processes and Learning Outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(1). 1-27. website: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&id=doi:10.1080/09243453.2010.536322
Hannan, M., Russell, J. L., Takahashi, S., & Park, S. (2015). Using Improvement Science to Better Support Beginning Teachers: The Case of the Building a Teacher Effectiveness Network. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(5). 494-508. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022487115602126
Harms, P.D., & Credé, M. (2010). Emotional Intelligence and Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051809350894
Herman, R., Dawson, P., Dee, T., Greene, J., Maynard, R., Redding, S., & Darwin, M. (2008). Turning Around Chronically Low-Performing Schools: A practice guide (NCEE #2008-4020). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. website: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/publications/practiceguides.
Jackson, D. (2000). The School Improvement Journey: Perspectives on Leadership. School Leadership & Management, 20(1). 61-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430068888
Karami-Akkary, R., Mahfouz, J., & Mansour, S. (2019). Sustaining School-Based Improvement: Considering Emotional Responses to Change. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(1). 50-67. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JEA-01-2018-0022
Kentucky Department of Education. 2021. Diagnostic Reviews. https://education.ky.gov/school/prischedrecov/Pages/Leadership-Assessments.aspx
KRS 160.346. Definitions -- Targeted and comprehensive support and improvement -- Revised plans -- Turnaround audit -- Review and report -- Intervention process -- Reimbursement of district -- Report required -- Exit criteria -- Schools requiring rigorous support and action -- District with significant number of targeted schools -- Evidence of violation -- Restoration of school's right to establish council. Commonwealth of Kentucky.
Kutash, J., Nico, E., Gorin, E., Rahmatullah, S., & Tallant, K. (2010). The School Turnaround Field Guide. FSG Social Impact Advisors.
Lewis, C. (2015). What is Improvement Science? Do We Need It in Education? Educational Researcher, 44(1). 54-61. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15570388
Mass Insight Education & Research Institution. (2017). Mass Insight State Development Network School Turnaround Diagnostic: Kentucky. Mass Insight Education & Research Institution, Boston, M.A.
Meyers, C.V., & Hitt, D.H. (2018). Planning for School Turnaround in the United States: An Analysis of the Quality of Prinicpal-Developed Quick Wins. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29(3). 362-382. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2018.1428202
Meyers, C.V., & VanGronigen, B.A. (2021). Planning for What? An Analysis of Root Cause Quality and Content in School Improvement Plans. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(4). 437-453. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2020-0156
Peng, J., Li, M., Wang, Z., & Yuying, L. (2020). Transformational Leadership and Employees’ Relations to Organizational Change: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886320920366
Peterson, A. (2016). Getting “What Works” Working: Building blocks for the integration of experimental and improvement science. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 39(3). 299-313. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2016.1170114
Quintelier, A., DeMayer, S. & Vanhoof, J. (2020). Determinants of Teacher’s Feedback Acceptance during a School Inspection Visit. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(4). 529-547. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1750432
Redding, C., & Searby, L. (2020). The Map is Not the Territory: Considering the Roel of School Improvement Plans in Turnaround Schools. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 23(3). 63-75. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1555458920938854
Robinson, V., Bendikson, L., McNaughton, S., Wilson, A., & Zhu, T. (2017). Joining the Dots: The Challenge of Creating Coherent School Improvement. Teachers College Record, 119(9). website: http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=21946
Rosenberg, L., Chrstianson, M.D., & Hague Angus, M. (2015). Improving Efforts in Rural Schools: Experience of Nine Schools Receiving School Improvement Grants. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(2). 194-210. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2015.1022109
Saldaña, J. 2016. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage Publications, London.
Sears, R., Hopf, F., Torres-Ayala, A., Williams, C., & Skryzpek, L. (2019). Using Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycles and Interdisciplinary Conversations to Transform Introductory Mathematics Courses. PRIMUS, 29(8). 881-902. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2018.1532938
Steiner, L, & Hassel, E.A. (Public Impact). (2011). Using Competencies to Improve School Turnaround Principal Success. Charlottesville: University of Virginia’s Darden/Curry Partnership for Leaders in Education. website: www.dardencurry.og.
Swaffield, S. (2015). Support and Challenge for School Leaders: Headteachers’ Perceptions of School Improvement Partners. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(1). 61-76. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1741143213494884
The Center on School Turnaround. (2017). Four domains for rapid school improvement: A systems framework. The Center for School Turnaround at WestEd. San Francisco, CA.
Thompson, C.S. (2018). ‘School Administrators’ and Stakeholders’ Attitudes toward, and Perspectives on, School Improvement Planning. Educational Planning, 25(4). 7-26.
Tinchor-Wagner, A., Wachen, J., Cannata, M., & Cohen-Vogel, L. (2017). Continuous Improvement in the Public School Context: Understanding how educators respond to plan-do-study-act cycles. Journal of Educational Change, 18(4). 465-494. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10833-017-9301-4
Tsakeni, M., Munje, P., & Jilta, L. (2021). Issues and Challenges Influencing School Improvement Opportunities for Science and Mathematics. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(3). 1300-1318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1884/cjes.v16i3.5853
U.S. Department of Education. (December 12, 2013). Waivers Granted Under No Child Left Behind. Flexibilities and Waivers. Accessed on February 1, 2022. https://www2.ed.gov/nclb/freedom/local/flexibility/waiverletters/index.html
Ward, G., & Miller, M. (2019). Action Research: A Tool for Transformation. Montessori Life: A Publication of the American Montessori Society, 31(3). 38-43. DOI: https://amshq.org/Educators/Membership/Montessori-Life
Woodland, R. H. (2016). Evaluating PK-12 Professional Learning Communities: An Improvement Science Perspective. American Journal of Evaluation, 37(4). 505-521. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098214016634203
Zayim Kurtay, M. (2020). Teacher Emotions in Organizational Change Process = Örgütsel Degisim Sürecinde Ögretmen Duygulari. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 26(3). 681-718. DOI: 10.14527/kuey.2020.015
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Matthew Courtney
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
