Integrating Empathy into Classroom Assessment Design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/na8ta057Keywords:
Empathy, Assessment, Assessment Design, Self-Evaluation, Self-Expression, Holistic Evaluation, equity in education , empathetic assessment, agency, student agency, self-efficacy, alternative grading, grading for equity, relational assessmentAbstract
Traditional assessment design focuses on outcomes and often disregards how students perceive their abilities, process emotions, or self-express. This indifference can undermine assessment outcomes and evaluation reliability (Hattie, 2023; Nilson, 2023; Reibel 2022). This paper introduces empathetic assessment design (EAD), a framework that reframes assessment as an event to simultaneously understand the student while evaluating their abilities to provide more precise grading and improved support. EAD integrates cognitive (self-evaluation), emotional (appraisal of emotional reactions and mindsets), and relational (self-expression) dimensions, enriching assessments with experiential insights. The information resulting from the EAD design provides context for outcomes and helps teachers assess the adequacy of student thinking, affective reactions, and needs. Despite concerns about workload and rigor, EAD builds on established theories—Bandura’s social cognitive theory (1997), Joe Feldman’s Grading for Equity (2018), and funds of knowledge and culturally responsive pedagogy (Ladson-Billings, 1995, 2021; Moll, 2015, 2019)—to create more insightful assessments. EAD complements equitable grading practices, gathering students’ real-time experiential information (Blum, 2020; Colby, 2019; Clark & Talbert, 2023; Feldman, 2018). While experts (Hattie, 2023, 2018; Schimmer, 2016; Wiliam, 2011) advocate for self-assessment and reflection, they often position these outside the assessment itself. But EAD embeds them within assessments, capturing in-the-moment insights to make evaluation more meaningful and illuminating.
Downloads
References
Adie, L. E., Willis, J., & Van der Kleij, F. M. (2018). Diverse perspectives on student agency in classroom assessment. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45(1), 1-12.
Bailey, K., & Jakicic, C. (2011). Common formative assessment: A toolkit for professional learning communities at work (2nd ed.). Solution Tree Press.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 13, 158-166.
Bandura, A. (2023). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective on human nature. John Wiley & Sons.
Berns, A., & East, J. P. (2020). Toward a pedagogy compatible with equitable grading: Tenets, difficulties, and suggestions. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 1358-1358).
Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80 (2), 144, 146-148.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in education: Principles, policy & practice, 25(6), 551-575.
Blum, S. D. (2020). Ungrading: Why rating students undermines learning (and what to do instead). West Virginia University Press.
Brookhart, S. M. (2020). How to give effective feedback to your students. ASCD.
Brown, R. D., & Robbins, K. R. (2023). Developing and reconceptualizing an equitable grading system in undergraduate education. Teacher Educators’ Journal, 16(1), 50-70.
Butler, A., & Miretzky, D. (2020). Funds of knowledge and early literacy: A mixed methods study. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 32(3), 265-283.
Chappuis, J., & Stiggins, R. (2014). Seven strategies of assessment for learning (2nd ed.). Pearson.
Clark, D., & Talbert, R. (2023). Grading for growth: A guide to alternative grading practices that promote authentic learning and student engagement in higher education. Taylor & Francis.
Cohen, G. L. (2022). Belonging: The science of creating connection and bridging divides. WW Norton & Company.
Colby, R. L. (2019). Competency-based education: A new architecture for K-12 schooling. Harvard Education Press.
Cuff, B. M., Brown, S. J., Taylor, L., & Howat, D. J. (2016). Empathy: A review of the concept. Emotion Review, 8(2), 144-153.
Danielson, Charlotte. (2022). Implementing the framework for teaching in enhancing professional practice. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self-determination theory. Handbook of theories of social psychology, 1(20), 416-436.
Doménech-Betoret, F., Abellán-Roselló, L., & Gómez-Artiga, A. (2017). Self-efficacy, satisfaction, and academic achievement: The mediator role of students’ expectancy-value beliefs. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1193.
Erkens, C., Schimmer, T., & Vagle, N. D. (2017). Essential assessment: Six tenets for bringing hope, efficacy, and achievement to the classroom. Solution Tree Press, the Solution Tree Assessment Center.
Esteban-Guitart, M., & Moll, L. C. (2014). Funds of identity: A new concept based on the funds of knowledge approach. Culture & Psychology, 20(1), 31-48.
Feldman, J. (2018). Grading for equity: What it is, why it matters, and how it can transform schools and classrooms. Corwin Press.
Grainger, P., & Weir, K. (2016). An alternative grading tool for enhancing assessment practice and quality assurance in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(1), 73-83.
Godwin, B., & Silk, D. (2022). Loving our students on purpose: Building a culture of joy, responsibility & connection. Loving On Purpose.
Guskey, T. R. (2014). On your mark: Challenging the conventions of grading and reporting. Solution Tree Press.
Guskey, T. R. (2022). Implementing mastery learning. Corwin Press.
Gurleat, M., Fitzpatrick, C., van Hover, S., & Cornett, A. (2023). “I just kind of guessed”: Student constructions of knowledge in AP microeconomics. The High School Journal 107(1), 41-68. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2023.a947205.
Hall, J. A., & Schwartz, R. (2019). Empathy present and future. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(3), 225-243.
Hasinoff, A. A., Bolyard, W., DeBay, D., Dunlap, J. C., Mosier, A. C., & Pugliano, E. (2024). “Success was actually having learned:” University student perceptions of ungrading. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 12.
Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: The sequel: A synthesis of over 2,100 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Heath, C., & Heath, D. (2017). The power of moments: Why certain experiences have extraordinary impact. Random House.
Hibbs, B. (2023). Utilizing the funds of knowledge approach to teach culturally and linguistically diverse learners: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Dignam, & M. T. Hebebci (Eds.), Current Academic Studies in Technology and Education 2023 (pp. 201-224). ISRES Publishing.
Hickey, A., & Riddle, S. (2024). Proposing a conceptual framework for relational pedagogy: pedagogical informality, interface, exchange and enactment. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(13), 3271-3285.
Immordino-Yang, M. H. (2015). Emotions, learning, and the brain: Exploring the educational implications of affective neuroscience. W. W. Norton & Company.
Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, B. L., Schreiber, C. A., & Redelmeier, D. A. (1993). When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psychological Science, 4(6), 401-405.
Kahneman, D. (2000). Experienced utility and objective happiness: A moment-based approach. In D. Kahneman, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values and frames (pp. 673-692). Cambridge University Press and the Russell Sage Foundation.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1996). On the reality of cognitive illusions. Psychological Review, 103(3), 582–591. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.582
Kahneman, D. (2013). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. Progress in Psychological Science around the World. Volume 1 Neural, Cognitive and Developmental Issues, 1-47.
Kahneman, D., Sibony, O., & Sunstein, C. R. (2021). Noise: A flaw in human judgment. Little, Brown Spark.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.
Kang, H., & Furtak, E. M. (2021). Learning theory, classroom assessment, and equity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 40(3), 73-82.
Karaman, P. (2021). The impact of self-assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 7(4), 1151-1166.
Kushnir, T., Xu, F., & Benson, J. B. (Eds.). (2012). Rational constructivism in cognitive development (Vol. 43). Academic Press.
Ladson‐Billings, G. (1995). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into practice, 34(3), 159-165.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2021). Culturally relevant pedagogy: Asking a different question. Teachers College Press.
Lemov, D. (2021). Teach like a champion 3.0: 63 techniques that put students on the path to college. John Wiley & Sons.
Loh, E. K. (2019). What we know about expectancy-value theory, and how it helps to design a sustained, motivating learning environment. System, 86, 102119.
Martin, A. J., & Collie, R. J. (2019). Teacher–student relationships and students’ engagement in high school: Does the number of negative and positive relationships with teachers matter?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(5), 861.
Martin, A. J., Malmberg, L. E., Kennett, R., Mansour, M., Papworth, B., & Pearson, J. (2019). What happens when students reflect on their self-efficacy during a test? Exploring test experience and test outcome in science. Learning and Individual Differences, 73, 59-66.
Maté, G., & Maté, D. (2022). The myth of normal: Trauma, illness, & healing in a toxic culture. Avery, an imprint of Penguin Random House.
Matusov, E., von Duyke, K., & Kayumova, S. (2016). Mapping concepts of agency in educational contexts. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50, 420- 446.
McIntyre, E., Rosebery, A. S., & González, N. (Eds.). (2001). Classroom diversity: Connecting curriculum to students’ lives (Vol. 88). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Moll, L. C. (2015). Tapping into the “hidden” home and community resources of students. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 51(3), 114-117.
Moll, L. C. (2019). Elaborating funds of knowledge: Community-oriented practices in international contexts. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 68(1), 130-138.
Muhammad, G. (2020). Cultivating genius: An equity framework for culturally and historically responsive literacy. Scholastic Incorporated.
Nasir, M., & Iqbal, S. (2019). Academic self efficacy as a predictor of academic achievement of students in pre-service teacher training programs. Bulletin of Education and Research, 41(1), 33-42.
Nilson, L.B. (2014). Specifications grading: Restoring rigor, motivating students, and saving faculty time (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003447061
Nilson, L.B. (2023). Specifications grading: Restoring rigor, motivating students, and saving faculty time (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Noddings, N. (1995). Teaching themes of care. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 675-675.
Noddings, N. (2012). The caring relation in teaching. Oxford review of education, 38(6), 771-781.
Noddings, N. (2019). The caring relation in teaching. In Learning to be human: The educational legacy of John MacMurray. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315747934
O’Connor, K. (2017). How to grade for learning: Linking grades to standards. Corwin Press.
Pondiscio, R. (2020). How the other half learns: Equality, excellence, and the battle over school choice. Penguin.
Reibel, A. R. (2022). Embracing Relational Teaching: How Strong Relationships Promote Student Self-Regulation and Efficacy. Solution Tree Press.
Reibel, A. R., Gobble, T., Onuscheck, M., & Twadell, E. (2024). Beyond PLC Lite: Evidence-Based Teaching and Learning in a Professional Learning Community at Work**®**. Solution Tree Press.
Reibel, A. R., Onuscheck, M., & Twadell, E. (2025). Pathways to Proficiency: Implementing Evidence-Based Grading, (A five-phase process to implement evidence-based grading). Solution Tree Press.
Ramos, D., & Kiyama, J. M. (2021). Tying it all together: Defining the core tenets of funds of knowledge. Educational Studies, 57(4), 429-449.
Rodriguez, G. M. (2013). Power and agency in education: Exploring the pedagogical dimensions of funds of knowledge. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 87-120.
Schimmer, T. (2016). Grading from the inside out. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
Schinske, J., & Tanner, K. (2014). Teaching more by grading less (or differently). CBE— Life Sciences Education, 13(2), 159-166.
Stenalt, M. H., & Lassesen, B. (2022). Does student agency benefit student learning? A systematic review of higher education research. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(5), 653-669.
Stommel, J. (2023). Undoing the grade: Why we grade, and how to stop. Hybrid Pedagogy.
Stranford, S. A. (2024, February). Fostering student agency and motivation: co-creation of a rubric for self-evaluation in an ungraded course. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 8, p. 1213444). Frontiers Media SA.).
Townsley, M. (2022). Using grading to support student learning. Routledge.
Vatterott, C. (2015). Rethinking grading: Meaningful assessment for standards-based learning. ASCD.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard University Press.
Waddington, J. (2023). Self-efficacy. ELT Journal, 77(2), 237-240.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 68-81.
Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Solution Tree Press.
Wolcott, G. (2019). Significant 72: Unleashing the power of relationships in today’s schools. FIRST Educational Resources, LLC.
Wormeli, R. (2023). Fair isn’t always equal: Assessment & Grading in the Differentiated Classroom. Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of School Administration Research and Development
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All published articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License.
.png)
