Digital Learning and Higher Education in Brazil: A Multicultural Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/jcihe.v16i2.5846Keywords:
Keywords: Brazil, comparative perspectives, digital era, higher education, multiculturalismAbstract
The present paper aims to discuss higher education and the role of digital learning in the Brazilian context. In a social justice, multicultural perspective, it argues that effective digital learning in higher education is likely to happen when digital curricular contents have been embedded with inclusionary strategies that foster plural students’ critical thinking and empowerment. To develop the argument, it firstly discusses the multicultural nature of Brazilian society and the relevance of conceptualizing digital learning and multicultural perspectives in education. It then highlights the higher education system and structure in Brazil, discussing how remote digital learning has been taking place in that system. It also depicts how digital learning in higher education has been conceived in Brazilian educational policies, both before, and as a result of the pandemic time in 2020. It contends that digital learning has been faced with two differing concepts by the public and the private sector of Brazilian higher education, either in a transformative, multicultural approach, or in a consumer, massified perspective. Based on a multicultural, intersectional approach, it argues that for higher education to have a strong impact in preparing future professionals for dealing with the challenges of globalised and multicultural societies, it should link digital learning with multicultural, intersectional concerns that value cultural diversity and fight against prejudices and exclusion. In that sense, the Brazilian case can be useful comparatively, by illustrating the potentials and the challenges of digital learning in unequal, multicultural countries.
Keywords: Brazil, comparative perspectives, digital era, higher education, multiculturalism
References
REFERENCES
Álvarez-Mendiola, G. (2012), Mexico: Great expectations, scattered approaches, disjointed results: The rocky road to lifelong learning in Mexican higher education. In: Slowey & Schuetze, H. G. (Eds.) Global Perspectives on Higher Education and Lifelong Learners (pp. 157 – 172). New York, Routledge.
Araujo, J. B.; Oliveira, M. G.; Barcellos, T. (2020), A Covid-19 e a volta às aulas: ouvindo as evidências, Ensaio, 28(108), 555 – 578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0104-40362020002802885
Brasil (2012). Lei nº 12.711, de 29 de agosto. Dispõe sobre o ingresso nas universidades federais e nas instituições federais de ensino técnico de nível médio e dá outras providências. [Quota Law] https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2012/lei/l12711.htm
Brazil, Ministry of Education (2020), Universidade Aberta do Brasil (Open University of Brazil) http://portal.mec.gov.br/, 2020. Access in May 2020.
Brazil, CNE, National Council of Education, Ministry of Education (2020), Parecer CNE/CP Nº: 5/2020, Reorganização do Calendário Escolar e da possibilidade de cômputo de atividades não presenciais para fins de cumprimento da carga horária mínima anual, em razão da Pandemia da COVID-19 (Special Official Recommendation about Reorganisation of school calendars and the possibility of taking distant remote on-line classes into account for the purpose of achieving the number of compulsory yearly class hours) https://abmes.org.br/arquivos/legislacoes/Parecer-cne-cp-005-2020-04-28.pdf. 2020.
Brazil, Ministry of Education (2020), Portaria MEC nº 345/2020 (Law concerning the offering of on-line distant education within on-site courses in federal public higher education institutions in Brazil), http://portal.mec.gov.br/component/content/article?id=88631, 2020. Access in May 2020.
Dias, E. S. De A. C. & Pinto, F. C. F. (2020) A Educação e a COVID 19, Editorial, Ensaio, Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação 28(108), 545 – 554. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-40362019002801080001
Freire, P. (1982), Pedagogia do Oprimido. São Paulo: Ed. Paz e Terra.
Honorato, G. & Zuccarelli, C. (2020), Report: Avaliação das Políticas de Ação Afirmativa no Ensino Superior no Brasil: Resultados e Desafios Futuros. Análise de dados da população brasileira e de indicadores das universidades federais, 2010-2019. https://static.poder360.com.br/2022/08/pesquisa-avaliacao-lei-de-cotas-lepes-acao-educativa.pdf
Ivenicki, A. (2018), Multiculturalismo e Formação de Professores: dimensões, possibilidades e desafios na contemporaneidade, Ensaio. Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação, 26(100), 1151-1167, 2018.
Ivenicki, A. (2019), Education Reform in Brazil: multicultural reflections. In: Ornelas, C. (ed.), Politics of Education in Latin America: reforms, resistance, and persistence, (pp. 101–115). Leiden: Koninklijke.
Ivenicki, A (2021a), COVID-19 and multicultural education in Brazil, Perspectives in Education 39(1), 237-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i1.14
Ivenicki, A. (2021b), Digital Lifelong Learning and Higher Education: multicultural strengths and challenges in pandemic times. Ensaio. Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação, 29(111) 360-380.
Milana, M.& Nesbit, T. (Eds) (2015), Global Perspectives on Adult Education and Learning Policies, (pp. 1-14). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Moreira, J. A., Henriques, S., Goulão, M. De F. & Barros, D. (2017), Digital Learning in Higher Education: A Training Course for Teaching Online. Open Praxis, vol. 9 issue 2, April–June 2017, pp. 253–263.
Mutka, K.A., Punie, Y. & Redeck, C. (2008), Digital Competence for Lifelong Learning Policy Brief, European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. htttp://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/Documents/JRC48708.TN.pdf. Access: May 2020.
Neves, B. & Eckert, C. (2017), Higher Education Systems and Institutions, Brazil. In: Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Springer Science and Business Media.
Nitahara, A. (2019), Agência Brasil, Acesso ao Ensino Superior no Brasil é Abaixo dos Padrões Internacionais. Agência Brasil, https://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/economia/noticia/2019-11/, Acesso: 19th May 2020.
Parreiras, C. & Macedo, R. M. (2020), Digital Inequalities and Education in Brazil during the Covid-19 pandemic: a brief reflection on the challenges of remote learning, Digital Culture and Education, July 6th.
Rafalow, M.H.& Puckett, C. (2022), Sorting Machines: digital technology and categorical inequality in Education, Educational Researcher, 51(4), 274-278.
Renda Dos Santos, L.M. & Okazaki, S. (2015), Planned E-learning adoption and occupational socialisation in Brazilian higher education, Studies in Higher Education, 41(11), 1974-1994, https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007940
Slowey, M. & Schuetze, H. G., (2012). All Change – No Change? Lifelong learners and higher education revisited. In: Slowey & Schuetze, H. G. (Eds.) Global Perspectives on Higher Education and Lifelong Learners, (pp. 1 – 22). New York, Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The findings, interpretations, conclusions, and views expressed in Journal of Comparative and International Higher Education (JCIHE) are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed in any manner to CIES, HESIG, or the sponsoring universities of the Editorial Staff. These works are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License. Readers are free to copy, display, and distribute articles that appear in JCIHE as long as the work is attributed to the author(s) and JCIHE, it is distributed for non-commercial purposes only, and no alteration or transformation is made in the work. All other uses must be approved by the author(s) or JCIHE. By submitting a manuscript, authors agree to transfer without charge the following rights to JCIHE upon acceptance of the manuscript: first worldwide serial publication rights and the right for JCIHE to grant permissions as its editors judge appropriate for the redistribution of the article, its abstract, and metadata associated with the article in professional indexing and reference services.
