Internationalization Higher Education for What?

An Analysis of National Strategies of Higher Education Internationalization in East Asia

Authors

  • You Zhang University of Toronto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32674/jcihe.v12i6S1.3077

Keywords:

Internationalization of higher education, national strategies, East Asia

Abstract

This article examines national strategies on higher education internationalization in three East Asian countries: China, Japan, and South Korea. Specifically, through document analysis of five national educational documents since 2014, it examines what activities of higher education internationalization are underway and, more importantly, how nation states justify them. It finds that the three countries tend to associate internationalization with the countries’ global competitiveness and status. In addition, internationalization in the three countries focuses on regional cooperation, justified by its benefits for economic growth and national security. Drawing on the realist perspective in international relations, this article argues that internationalization of higher education at the national level in East Asia is instrumentalized to benefit national economic competitiveness and development and political security, while the important aspect of teaching and learning is overlooked.

References

Buckner, E. S. (2017). The changing discourse on higher education and the nation-state, 1960–2010. Higher Education, 74(3), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0056-2

Byun, K., & Kim, M. (2011). Shifting patterns of the government’s policies for the internationalization of Korean higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 15(5), 467–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315310375307

Hammond, C. D. (2016). Internationalization, nationalism, and global competitiveness: A comparison of approaches to higher education in China and Japan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(4), 555–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9459-0

Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: Definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 5–31.

McKinlay, R. D., & Little, R. (1986). Global problems and world order (Vol. 4, p. 89). Frances Pinter.

Sanders, J. S. (2018). National internationalisation of higher education policy in Singapore and Japan: Context and competition. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 7925, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2017.1417025

Waldow, F. (2018). Commentary to Part III: Why Is “Being International” So Attractive? “Being International” as a Source of Legitimacy and Distinction. In C. Maxwell, U. Deppe, H.-H. Krüger, & W. Helsper (Eds.), Elite Education and Internationalisation: From the Early Years to Higher Education (pp. 247–253). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59966-3_15

Downloads

Published

2021-02-05 — Updated on 2021-02-05

Versions

Issue

Section

2024 Emerging Scholar Summary - 16(6) 2024

How to Cite

Internationalization Higher Education for What? An Analysis of National Strategies of Higher Education Internationalization in East Asia. (2021). Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education, 12(6S1). https://doi.org/10.32674/jcihe.v12i6S1.3077