Factors Affecting Competitiveness in University Ranking Exercises
Lessons from Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/jcihe.v13i2.2123Keywords:
Brazil, competition, geography, rankings, universitiesAbstract
In recent years, international and national university ranking exercises have become commonplace, serving a host of stakeholders and beneficiaries including students, institutions, and governments. As such, they have drawn increasing scrutiny from academics and other observers, many of whom have called into question the integrity of the methodologies employed, and thus the outcomes of the process. By contrast, relatively little attention has been paid to largely external factors that can affect a given institution’s ability to compete within a given ranking exercise, such as their corporate status, geographic location, and/or access to resources. Building on previous work examining the impact of such “extraneous” factors, this study undertakes a quantitative analysis of the best-known university ranking exercise in Brazil to better understand the impact of such variables, both within other national contexts and well beyond.
References
Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU). (2018). World university rankings. http://www.shanghairanking.com/arwu2019.html
Anowar, F., Helal, M., Afroj, A., Sultana, S., Sarker, F., & Mamun, K. (2015). A critical review on world university ranking in terms of top four ranking systems. In K. Elleithy and T. Sobh (Eds.), New Trends in Networking, Computing, E-learning, Systems Sciences and Engineering (pp. 559-566). Springer International.
Bacha, E. (2012). Belíndia 2.0: Fábulas e Ensaios sobre o Pais dos Contrastes. Civilização Brasileira.
Balbachevsky, E. (2013). Academic research and advanced training: Building up research universities in Brazil. In J. Balán (Ed.), Latin’s America’s new Knowledge Economy: Higher Education, Government and International Collaboration. AIFS Foundation and Institute of International Education.
Bekhradnia, B. (2016). International university rankings: For good or ill? HEPI Report 89. Higher Education Policy Institute.
Buela-Casal, G., Gutierrez-Martinez, O., Bermudez-Sanchez, M., & Vadilla-Munoz, O. (2007). Comparative study of international academic rankings of universities. Scientometrics, 71(3), 349-365.
Ellen, P. (2017, March 7). Ranking Não é Critério Absoluto de Qualidade, Diz Criatora do RUF. Jeduca. https://jeduca.org.br/texto/ranking-nao-e-criterio-absoluto-de-qualidade-diz-criadora-do-ruf
Folha de São Paulo. (2019a). Ranking Universitário Folha. http://ruf.folha.uol.com.br/2018/o-ruf/ranking-universidades
Folha de São Paulo. (2019b). Como é Feito o Ranking Universitário Folha. http://ruf.folha.uol.com/br/2019/noticias/com-e-feito-o-ranking-universitario-folha.shtml
Folha de São Paulo. (2019c, April 30). MEC Estende Corte de 30% de verbas a todas universidades federais. https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/educacao/2019/04/mec-estende-corte-de-30-de-verbas-a-todas-universidades-federais.shtml
Hazelkorn, E. (2013). World-class universities or world-class systems? Rankings and higher education policy choices. In M. Marope, P. Wells and E. Hazelkorn (Eds.), Rankings and Accountability in Higher Education: Uses and Misuses (pp. 74-94). UNESCO Publishing.
Hazelkorn, E. (2018). Reshaping the world order of higher education: The role and impact of rankings on national and global systems. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 2(1), 4-31.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografía e Estatística (IBGE). (2019a). Sistema de Contas Regionais: Brasil 2016. http://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualização/livros/livro1619_informative.pdf
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografía e Estatística (IBGE). (2019b). Estimativas da População Residente no Brasil e Unidades da Federação Com Data de Referência em 1 de Julho de 2018. ftp://ftp.ibge.gov.br.Estimativas_de_Populacao/Estimativas_2018/estimativa_dou_2018_20181019.pdf
Jöns, H., & Hoyler, M. (2013). Global geographies of higher education: The perspective of world university rankings. Geoforum, 46, 45-59.
Jump, Paul. (2015). Metrics: How to handle them responsibly. Times Higher Education. www.timeshighereducation.com/features/metrics-how-to-handle-them-responsibly
Ministério da Educação (MEC). (2017). Censo da Educação Superior, 2016: Principais Resultados. Tabela 1.01. Brasília: Directoria de Estatísticas Educacionais.
Ministério da Educação (MEC). (2018). Cadastro Nacional de Cursos e Instituições de Educação Superior. http://emec.mec.gov.br
Liu, Nian Cai. (2013). The academic ranking of world universities and its future direction. In M. Marope, P. Wells and E. Hazelkorn (Eds.), Rankings and Accountability in Higher Education: Uses and Misuses (pp.24-39). UNESCO Publishing.
Maxwell, Daniel. (2018, November 28). The Problem with University Rankings. SI News. http://www.studyinternational.com/news/the-problem-with-university-rankings/
Marope, M., & Peter W. (2013). University rankings: The many sides of the debate. In M. Marope, P. Wells and E. Hazelkorn (Eds.), Rankings and Accountability in Higher Education: Uses and Misuses (pp. 7-19). UNESCO Publishing.
Nader, H. Bi. (2017). Estudo Comparado sobre Ensino Superior no Brasil, Europa e Estados Unidos. Report. Conselho Nacional de Educação.
Nyssen, J. M. (2018). The Social Dimension and University Rankings. In A. Curaj, L. Deca, and R. Pricopie (Eds). European Higher Education Area: The Impact of Past and Future Policies (pp. 155-169). SpringerOpen.
Ordorika, I., & Marion L. (2013). A decade of international university rankings: A critical perspective from Latin America. In M. Marope, P. Wells and E. Hazelkorn (Eds.), Rankings and Accountability in Higher Education: Uses and Misuses (pp. 208-231). UNESCO Publishing.
Pfeffermann, G. (2016, August 8). Brazil: Like India or Ghana? The Globalist. https://www.theglobalist.com/brazil-like-india-ghana-belindia-or-enghana-economy-olympics/
Pusser, B., & Marginson, S. (2013). University rankings in critical perspective. The Journal of Higher Education, 84(4), 544-568.
QS World University Rankings. (2018). Top global universities. http://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2018
Ribeiro, J. L. L. S. (2011). Avaliação das Universidades Brasileiras: As Possibilidades de Avaliar e as Dificuldades de Ser Avaliado. Avaliação, 16(1), 57-71.
Sabine R. (2017). Crise nas universidades. Ciencia e Cultura, 69(2), 6-8.
Sowter, B. (2013). Issues of transparency and applicability in global university rankings. In M. Marope, P. Wells and E. Hazelkorn (Eds.), Rankings and Accountability in Higher Education: Uses and Misuses (pp. 56-68). UNESCO Publishing.
Sowter, B., Reggio, D., & Hijazi, S. (2017). QS World university rankings. In Cantu-Ortiz, F. J. (Ed.), Research Analytics: Boosting University Productivity and Competitiveness through Scientometrics (pp. 122-136). Auerbach.
Steiner, J. (2007). The Brazilian research universities. Unpublished. ms. Instituto de Estudos Avançados da Universidade de São Paulo.
Tenório, R. M., & Brandão de Andrade., M. A. (2009). A Avaliação da Educação Superior no Brasil. In J. Lordelo and M. Dazzani (Eds.), Avaliação Educacional: Desatando e Reatando Nós (pp. 31-55). EDUFBA.
Time Higher Education (THE). (2018). World university rankings. http://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/world-ranking
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2021-05-07 (2)
- 2021-05-05 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The findings, interpretations, conclusions, and views expressed in Journal of Comparative and International Higher Education (JCIHE) are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed in any manner to CIES, HESIG, or the sponsoring universities of the Editorial Staff. These works are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License. Readers are free to copy, display, and distribute articles that appear in JCIHE as long as the work is attributed to the author(s) and JCIHE, it is distributed for non-commercial purposes only, and no alteration or transformation is made in the work. All other uses must be approved by the author(s) or JCIHE. By submitting a manuscript, authors agree to transfer without charge the following rights to JCIHE upon acceptance of the manuscript: first worldwide serial publication rights and the right for JCIHE to grant permissions as its editors judge appropriate for the redistribution of the article, its abstract, and metadata associated with the article in professional indexing and reference services.