Disciplinary Variation in Curriculum Internationalization
Findings from a Mixed-Methods Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/fav71m79Keywords:
academic disciplines, curriculum internationalization, internationalization of the curriculum at home (IoCaH), mixed-methodAbstract
Top-down strategies for curriculum internationalization (CI) often neglect discipline-specific preferences in content and teaching methods. This limited understanding of how content is prioritized across disciplines makes relying on a single implementation plan impractical. To supplement the few, almost exclusively qualitative, studies on this topic, this pilot study aims to answer the questions: what are the discipline-specific rationales for (non)engagement with CI? and what are the preferred internationalized teaching strategies across disciplines? In this study the relationship between variables about international learning environment and outcomes were tested against Biglan’s classification of academic disciplines using Chi-square, Spearman’s and Fisher’s tests. Preliminary findings of this study show no statistical significance in the relationship between disciplinary groupings and questions about international learning environment and outcomes. The findings of this study imply that the two most-cited frameworks used in CI literature (Biglan and Becher, who builds on Biglan’ framework) may result in incomplete or misleading interpretations regarding disciplines' orientations towards internationalization.
References
Agnew, M. (2013). Strategic Planning: An Examination of the Role of Disciplines in Sustaining Internationalization of the University. Journal of Studies in International Education, 17(2), 183-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315312464655
Becher, T. (1994). The Significance of Disciplinary Differences. Studies in Higher Education, 19(2), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079412331382007
Biglan, A. (1973). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034699
Braxton, J. M., & Hargens, L. L. (1996). Variation among academic disciplines: analytical frameworks and research. In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 11, pp. 1–46).
Braught, E., Hiller, S. C., & Nelson Laird, T. (2024, April). Faculty perceptions of their disciplinary cultures: Re-evaluating Biglan’s dimensions. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia. https://doi.org/10.3102/2109541
Clifford, V. (2009). Engaging the disciplines in internationalising the curriculum. International Journal for Academic Development, 14(2), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440902970122
de Wit, H., & Leask, B. (2015). Internationalization, the Curriculum and the Disciplines. International Higher Education, (83), 10–12. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2015.83.9079
Guneyli, V.B., Lane, S., Guneyli, V. B., & Lane, J. O. (2024). Siloed in Their Thoughts: A Phenomenological Study of Higher Education Leaders’ Perceptions of Internationalization in Changing Times. Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education, 16(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.32674/jcihe.v16i1.3189
Jin, L., & Schneider, J. (2019). Faculty Views on International Students: A Survey Study. Journal of International Students, 9(1), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v9i1.268
Jones, W. (2011). Variation among academic disciplines: An update on analytical frameworks and research. Journal of the Professoriate, 6(1), 9–27.
Leask, B., & Bridge, C. (2013). Comparing internationalisation of the curriculum in action across disciplines: Theoretical and practical perspectives. Compare, 43(1), 79–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2013.746566
Neumann, R., Parry, S., & Becher, T. (2002). Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: A conceptual analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 27(4), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507022000011525
Simpson, A. (2017). The surprising persistence of Biglan’s classification scheme. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1520–1531. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1111323
Teshome, H., Seyoum, Y., Dufera, D., & Assefa, S. (2024). Academics' beliefs regarding the importance of curriculum internationalization in the Ethiopian research universities. Heliyon, 10(8), e29537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29537
Whitsed, C., & Green, W. (2015). Critical Perspectives on Internationalising the Curriculum in Disciplines - Reflective Narrative Accounts from Business, Education and Health. In C. Whitsed & W. Green (Eds.), Critical Perspectives on Internationalising the Curriculum in Disciplines: Reflective Narrative Accounts from Business, Education and Health. Sense Publishers.
Zahid, G., & Neary, S. (2023). Faculty members’ perceptions of internationalization of curriculum: Globalization and localization, a comparative study. Asian Education and Development Studies, 12(23), 166-180. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-03-2023-0024
Zou, T. X. P., Law, L. Y. N., & Chu, B. C. B. (2023). Are some disciplines ‘hard to engage’? A cross-disciplinary analysis of university teachers’ approaches to internationalisation of the curriculum. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(5), 1267–1282. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2217092
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The findings, interpretations, conclusions, and views expressed in Journal of Comparative and International Higher Education (JCIHE) are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed in any manner to CIES, HESIG, or the sponsoring universities of the Editorial Staff. These works are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License. Readers are free to copy, display, and distribute articles that appear in JCIHE as long as the work is attributed to the author(s) and JCIHE, it is distributed for non-commercial purposes only, and no alteration or transformation is made in the work. All other uses must be approved by the author(s) or JCIHE. By submitting a manuscript, authors agree to transfer without charge the following rights to JCIHE upon acceptance of the manuscript: first worldwide serial publication rights and the right for JCIHE to grant permissions as its editors judge appropriate for the redistribution of the article, its abstract, and metadata associated with the article in professional indexing and reference services.
