Digitalisation, Neoliberalism and Globalisation of Higher Education in the Australian Context
Keywords:
Australia, digitalisation, globalisation, higher education, identity, Learning Management System, neoliberalismAbstract
This article explores the rise of digitalisation in Australian higher education and its impact on learning and teaching, administration, and regulatory obligations. This digitalisation can be epitomised by the prevalence of learning management systems (LMS) which have radically reshaped the conduct and configuration of education. As universities have embraced the LMS, as forced by the pandemic, the swelling confluence of disruptive digitalisation combined with globalisation, regulatory reforms, and shifts in government funding models have seen the Australian higher education sector in constant evolution. This article contextualises the impacts of digitalisation using the lens of neoliberalism and globalisation, with past, current, and future state considerations in the sector. It includes a case study from a large metropolitan Australian university with a signature pedagogy of industry-partnered and flexible learning to consider how Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in Australia must continue to evolve in identity and provision of learning to serve social interests for the future in digitalised contexts.
References
Australian Qualifications Framework. (2023). Australian Qualifications Framework. AQF Website, accessed 14 April 2023. https://www.aqf.edu.au/
Australian Government. (2020a). Online delivery – key considerations for providers. TEQSA Website, accessed 16 April 2023, https://www.teqsa.gov.au/guides-resources/resources/sector-updates-and-alerts/online-delivery-key-considerations-providers
Australian Government. (2020b). Foundations for good practice: The student experience of online learning in Australian higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. TEQSA Website, accessed 16 April 2023, https://www.teqsa.gov.au/guides-resources/resources/sector-updates-and-alerts/foundations-good-practice-student-experience-online-learning-australian-higher-education-during-covid-19-pandemic
Australian Government. (2021). Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2021. Federal Register of Legislation Website, accessed 15 April 2023, https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2022C00105
Australian Government. (2022). Protecting academic integrity. TEQSA Website, accessed 17 April 2023, https://www.teqsa.gov.au/guides-resources/protecting-academic-integrity
Bebbington, W. (2013). With lectures online, small classes are possible – we’re doing it now. Times Higher Education Website, accessed 20 March 2023, https://www.timeshighereducation.com/with-lectures-online-small-classes-are-possible-were-doing-it-now-says-warren-bebbington/2005973.article
Craig, R., & Williams, A. (2015). Data, technology, and the great unbundling of higher education. EDUCAUSE Review, 50(5), pp. 11–25. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2015/8/data-technology-and-the-great-unbundling-of-higher-education
Coleborne, C. (2023). Why arts degrees and other generalist programs are the future of Australian higher education. The Conversation Website, accessed 17 May 2023, https://theconversation.com/why-arts-degrees-and-other-generalist-programs-are-the-future-of-australian-higher-education-203046
D’Agostino, S. (2023) China bans overseas online colleges. Inside Higher Education Website, accessed 17 May 2023, https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2023/02/09/china-bans-students-enrolling-foreign-online-colleges
Davis, G. (2022). Why are Australian universities so large? Edited by Horne, J., & Matthews, A.M.T. Australian Universities: A Conversation about Public Good. Sydney: Sydney University Press.
Dede, C. J., & Richards, J. (2020). The 60-Year Curriculum: New Models for Lifelong Learning in the Digital Economy. Taylor & Francis Group.
Department of Education, (2019). Review of the Australian Qualifications Framework Final Report. Department of Education Website, accessed 14 April 2023, https://www.education.gov.au/higher-education-reviews-and-consultations/resources/review-australian-qualifications-framework-final-report-2019
Department of Education, (2022). National Priorities and Industry Linkage Fund (NPILF). Department of Education Website, accessed 15 April 2023, https://www.education.gov.au/job-ready/npilf
Department of Education, (2023). Australian Universities Accord Panel Discussion Paper. Department of Education Website, accessed 15 April 2023, https://www.education.gov.au/australian-universities-accord/resources/australian-universities-accord-panel-discussion-paper
Department of Education, Skills and Employment, (2020). Job-ready Graduates Discussion Paper. Department of Education Website, accessed 14 April 2023. https://www.education.gov.au/job-ready/resources/job-ready-graduated-discussion-paper
Department of Education, Skills and Employment, (2022). National Microcredentials Framework. Department of Education Website, accessed 17 April 2023 https://www.education.gov.au/higher-education-publications/resources/national-microcredentials-framework
Dwivedi, N. (2019). Exploring Institutional Logics for Technology-Mediated Higher Education. Taylor & Francis Group.
Graham, C. R. (2005). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. Wiley.
Han, X., Wang, Y., & Jiang, L. (2019). Towards a framework for an institution-wide quantitative assessment of teachers’ online participation in blended learning implementation. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.03.003
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust T., & Bond A. (2021). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Website, accessed 17 April, 2023 https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-andonline-learning
Huang, J., Matthews, K.E., & Lodge, J.M. (2021). ‘The university doesn’t care about the impact it is having on us’: academic experiences of the institutionalisation of blended learning. Higher Education Research & Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1915965
Instructure. (n.d.) RMIT University: Increasing online participation by 1500% with Canvas LMS [Case Study]. Instructure Website, accessed 15 April 2023, https://www.instructure.com/en-au/resources/case-studies/rmit-university-increasing-online-participation-1500-canvas-lms
Lambert, S. (2020). Do MOOCs contribute to student equity and social inclusion? A systematic review 2014–18. Computers & Education, 145 (3), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103693
Lang, J. (2023). Workforce upskilling: can universities meet the challenges of lifelong learning? The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-01-2023-0001
Mestan, K. (2019). Create a fine blend: An examination of institutional transition to blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 70-84. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3216
Popenici, S. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Learning Futures: Critical Narratives of Technology and Imagination in Higher Education. Routledge.
Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Bodily, R. G., & Sandberg, D. S. (2016). A qualitative analysis of institutional drivers and barriers to blended learning adoption in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.08.003
Purtill, J. (2022). Why the NBN still matters – and how it can be improved after the election. ABC News Website, accessed 15 April 2023 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-05-17/nbn-election-future-of-australia-internet-connection-speeds/101060092
QS World Rankings. (2023). World University Rankings. Top Universities Website, accessed 14 April 2023. https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2023
Sankey, M., Yongsheng, Z., & Junhong, X. (2020). Putting the pedagogic horse in front of the technology cart. Journal of Distance Education in China, 5(544). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2020.05.006
Selwyn, N., & Facer, K. (2014) The sociology of education and digital technology: past, present and future. Oxford Review of Education, 40 (4), pp. 482-496. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2014.933005
Study Australia (2023). List of Australian Universities. Study Australia Website, accessed 14 April 2023. https://www.studyaustralia.gov.au/english/study/universities-higher-education/list-of-australian-universities
Subic, A. (2021). Technology as a Transformation Enabler. University and Research Leadership Forum: Universities 4.0 Discussion Paper. Global Federation of Competitiveness Councils.
Times Higher Education. (2023). World University Rankings. Times Higher Education Website, accessed 14 April 2023. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2023/world-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/locations/AUS/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats
Turner, D. (2020). Globalisation and neo-liberal higher education reforms. In: Zajda, J. (eds) Globalisation, Ideology and Neo-Liberal Higher Education Reforms. Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1751-7_9
Universities Australia. (2022). Indigenous Strategy 2022-25 [Publication]. Universities Australia Website, accessed 15 April 2023 https://www.universitiesaustralia.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/UA-Indigenous-Strategy-2022-25.pdf
Veletsianos, G., Kimmons, R., & Bondah, F. (2023). ChatGPT and higher education: Initial prevalence and areas of interest. EDUCAUSE Review Website, accessed 14 April 2023. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2023/3/chatgpt-and-higher-education-initial-prevalence-and-areas-of-interest
Victoria State Government. (2021). Media Release: Backing Victorian universities when they need it most. Victoria State Government Website, accessed 17 April 2023, https://www.premier.vic.gov.au/backing-victorian-universities-when-they-need-it-most
Watts, R, (2017). Public Universities, Managerialism and the Value of Higher Education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wheaton, H., & Mastro, A. (2018). Juggling a Canvas roll-out: The three balls of quality, consistency, and support. InstructureCon, Colorado. https://community.canvaslms.com/t5/InstructureCon-2018/Juggling-a-Canvas-Roll-Out-The-3-Balls-of-Quality-Consistency/m-p/384162
Wheaton, H., & Young, S. (2019). It’s elemental: Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) as scalable and sustainable student-centred practice in context. In Chew, Y. W., Mun, C.K., & Alphonso, A. (Eds) The 36th Australasian Society for Computers in Learning and Tertiary Education (ASCILITE) Conference Proceedings, Singapore, (pp. 612-616). https://2019conference.ascilite.org/proceedings.html
Wheaton, H., & Young, S. (2023). Transition techniques when introducing change: A sociomaterial approach to the virtual university. In M.D. Sankey, H. Huijser & R. Fitzgerald (Eds) Technology-Enhanced Learning and the Virtual University. SpringerLink. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-9438-8
Zawacki-Richter, O., & Latchem, C. (2018). Exploring four decades of research in Computers & Education. Computers and education, 122, 136-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.001
Zajda, J. (2020). Globalisation, Ideology and Neo-Liberal Higher Education Reforms. Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research, vol. 21. Springer Netherlands.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The findings, interpretations, conclusions, and views expressed in Journal of Comparative and International Higher Education (JCIHE) are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed in any manner to CIES, HESIG, or the sponsoring universities of the Editorial Staff. These works are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License. Readers are free to copy, display, and distribute articles that appear in JCIHE as long as the work is attributed to the author(s) and JCIHE, it is distributed for non-commercial purposes only, and no alteration or transformation is made in the work. All other uses must be approved by the author(s) or JCIHE. By submitting a manuscript, authors agree to transfer without charge the following rights to JCIHE upon acceptance of the manuscript: first worldwide serial publication rights and the right for JCIHE to grant permissions as its editors judge appropriate for the redistribution of the article, its abstract, and metadata associated with the article in professional indexing and reference services.
