Mapping institutional changes in higher education: the comparative analysis of the effects of democratic backsliding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/jcihe.v13i5S.4214Keywords:
academic freedom, democratic backsliding, university autonomyAbstract
The world has witnessed democratic decline in 23 countries worldwide during the last decade (Freedom House, 2019) in the context of rising nationalism and right-wing populism (Fraser, 2017; Robertson, 2018, 2020). The political importance of this topic is rooted in the fact that higher education is one of the most crucial public goods (Marginson, 2007, 2017) and governments tend to exercise tighter control over HEIs while democratic conditions worsening (Perry, 2015). Although many studies have examined the effects of the transition to democracy on higher education globally (O’Donnell et al., 2013; O’Donnell et al., 1986, Salto, 2020), very few have studied the reverse trend – democratic backsliding. Given that university autonomy is a wider term that encompasses the practises undertaken by universities to operate, researching its aspects, and assessing the true implications of democratic backsliding on universities represents an important field for current and future research.
My research investigates the impact of democratic backsliding on the university autonomy, by examining the cases of Turkey, Hungary, and Poland. These countries were considered democracies until the 2010s, but they are increasingly moving away from democracy (Freedom House, 2020). The study draws on an extensive analysis of publicly accessible government laws and regulations, university decrees, mission statements, political pamphlets, online media sources and interviews, and grey literature to analyze institutional responses as well as field work and interviews. I employ neoliberal authoritarianism and historical institutionalism as a framework to investigate the critical junctures and institutional changes affecting appointive (hiring, promotion, and dismissal of staff), financial (funding levels and criteria, preparation and allocation of the university budget, and accountability), and academic (access, curriculum, degree requirements, and academic freedom) autonomy (Ordorika, 2003).
References
Beach, D. (2020). Causal case studies for comparative policy analysis. In Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Comparative Policy Analysis (Edited by B. Guy Peters and Guillaume Fontaine, pp. 238–153). https://www.elgaronline.com/search?f_0=author&q_0=Derek+Beach
Bruff, I. (2014). The Rise of Authoritarian Neoliberalism. Rethinking Marxism, 26(1), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2013.843250
Christensen, T. (2011). University governance reforms: Potential problems of more autonomy? Higher Education, 62(4), 503–517.
Cianetti, L., & Hanley, S. (2021). The End of the Backsliding Paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 32(2), 66–80.
Csaky, Z. (2020). Nations in Transit 2020: Dropping the Democratic Facade. Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/2020/dropping-democratic-facade
Crouch, C. (2011). The Strange Non-death of Neo-liberalism. Polity.
Diamond, L. (2021). Democratic regression in comparative perspective: Scope, methods, and causes. Democratization, 28(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1807517
Dönmez, P. E., & Duman, A. (2020). Marketisation of Academia and Authoritarian Governments: The Cases of Hungary and Turkey in Critical Perspective. Critical Sociology, 0896920520976780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920520976780
Fraser Institute. (2017, September 28). Economic Freedom of the World: 2017 Annual Report. Fraser Institute. https://bit.ly/2yq5JF2
Freedom House. (2019). Democracy in Retreat. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2019/democracy-retreat
Giroux, H. A. (2011). On critical pedagogy. Continuum.
Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
Levy, D. (2009). For-profit versus Nonprofit Private Higher Education. International Higher Education, 54, Article 54. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2009.54.8414
Marginson, S. (2007). The public/private divide in higher education: A global revision. Higher Education, 53(3), 307–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-8230-y
Marginson, S. (2017). Higher education and the common good. Melbourne University Publishing.
Mettler, S. (2014). Degrees of inequality: How the politics of higher education sabotaged the American dream. Basic Books, a member of the Perseus Books Group.
Olsen, J. P. (2009a). Change and continuity: An institutional approach to institutions of democratic government. European Political Science Review, 1(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773909000022
Olsen, J. P. (2009b). Democratic Government, Institutional Autonomy and the Dynamics of Change. West European Politics, 32(3), 439–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380902779048
Ordorika, I. (2003). The Limits of University Autonomy: Power and Politics at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Higher Education, 46(3), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025382504110
Pachuashvili, M. (2011). Governmental Policies and their Impact on Private Higher Education Development in Post-Communist Countries: Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania and Georgia, 1990-2005. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 13(4), 397–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2011.583108
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed (p. 532). Sage Publications, Inc.
Perry, E. J. (2015). Higher Education and Authoritarian Resilience: The Case of China, Past and Present.
Perry, E. J. (2020). Educated acquiescence: How academia sustains authoritarianism in China. Theory and Society, 49(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-019-09373-1
Peters, B. G., & Fontain, G. (2020). Handbook of research methods and applications in comparative policy analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Pusser, B. (2016). A State Theoretical Approach to Understanding Contest in Higher Education. In S. Slaughter & B. J. Taylor (Eds.), Higher Education, Stratification, and Workforce Development: Competitive Advantage in Europe, the US, and Canada (pp. 331–348). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21512-9_17
Robertson, S. (2018, August 2). Diversity in the higher education ecosystem. Culture, Politics and Global Justice. https://cpgjcam.net/2018/08/02/diversity-in-the-higher-education-ecosystem/
Robertson, S. L. (2020). Powershift: Universities and the Seismic Winds of Change. In Universities as Political Institutions (pp. 11–32). Brill. https://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789004422582/BP000012.xml
Romanelli, E., & Tushman, M. L. (1994). Organizational Transformation as Punctuated Equilibrium: An Empirical Test. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1141–1166. https://doi.org/10.2307/256669
O’Donnell, G. A., Whitehead, L., & Schmitter, P. C. (1986). Transitions from authoritarian rule: Prospects for democracy. Johns Hopkins University Press.
O’Donnell, G., Schmitter, P. C., & Whitehead, L. (2013). Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives. JHU Press.
Peck, J. (2010). Constructions of Neoliberal Reason. Oxford University Press.
Salto, D. J. (2020). Comparative Higher Education Policy Under Nondemocratic Regimes in Argentina and Chile: Similar Paths, Different Policy Choices. Higher Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00194-x
Szadkowski, K., & Krzeski, J. (2019). In, Against, and Beyond: A Marxist Critique for Higher Education in Crisis. Social Epistemology, 33(6), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2019.1638465
Tomini, L. (2017). When Democracies Collapse: Assessing Transitions to Non-Democratic Regimes in the Contemporary World. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315189888
Valimaa, J. (2014). University Revolutions and Academic Capitalism: Actors, Mechanisms, Field, and Networks—Research portal—Converis—University of Jyväskylä. In Academic Capitalism in the Age of Globalization (B. Cantwell, I. Kauppinen, pp. 33–54). Johns Hopkins University Press. https://converis.jyu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/23946018?auxfun=&lang=en_GB
Vatansever, A. (2020). At the margins of academia: Exile, precariousness, and subjectivity. Brill.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Applications of case study research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The findings, interpretations, conclusions, and views expressed in Journal of Comparative and International Higher Education (JCIHE) are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed in any manner to CIES, HESIG, or the sponsoring universities of the Editorial Staff. These works are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License. Readers are free to copy, display, and distribute articles that appear in JCIHE as long as the work is attributed to the author(s) and JCIHE, it is distributed for non-commercial purposes only, and no alteration or transformation is made in the work. All other uses must be approved by the author(s) or JCIHE. By submitting a manuscript, authors agree to transfer without charge the following rights to JCIHE upon acceptance of the manuscript: first worldwide serial publication rights and the right for JCIHE to grant permissions as its editors judge appropriate for the redistribution of the article, its abstract, and metadata associated with the article in professional indexing and reference services.
