Reimagining Global Partnerships in Higher Education through Open Systems Theory
Keywords:boundary spanning, community engagement, global partnerships, open system theory, stakeholders
Although global higher education partnerships can promote greater intercultural understanding, establish unique environments for student and faculty development, and generate opportunities for innovative and entrepreneurial ventures, they can be beset with problems that negate their potential effectiveness. This paper proposes that open systems theory offers a constructive lens for reimagining global higher education partnerships so that they not only benefit internal stakeholders, but also society. It begins with the basic concepts associated with systems theory, with particular attention to the differences between rational and natural systems, as well as open and closed systems. To project how open systems theory might encourage global partnerships to embrace institutional outreach with the environment, the relationship of open systems theory with community engagement is then explored. Finally, the paper shows how boundaries can be either reinforced or traversed through deliberate buffering, bridging, and boundary spanning strategies.
Adams, K. R. (2014). The exploration of community boundary spanners in university-community partnerships. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 18(3), 113-118. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1043307.pdf
Ahmad, M. (2021, July 24). Government attacks on academic freedom are mounting. University World News. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20210719102159725
Aldrich, H. (1971). Organizational boundaries and inter-organizational conflict. Human Relations, 24(4), 279-293. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872677102400401
Altbach, P. G., & de Wit, H. (2020). Rethinking the relevance of international branch campuses. International Higher Education, 101, 14-16.
Aviv, R. (2013, September 2). The imperial presidency. New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/09/09/the-imperial-presidency
Benson, L, Harkavy, I., & Puckett, J. (2000). An implementation revolution as a strategy for fulfilling the democratic promise of university-community partnerships: Penn-West Philadelphia as an experiment in progress. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 24-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764000291003
Bourdieu, P. (1973). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In R. Brown (Ed.), Knowledge, education, and cultural change: Papers in the sociology of education (pp. 71–112). Tavistock Publications.
Boyer, E. L. (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 49(7), 18-33. https://doi.org/10.2307/3824459
Boyle, M. E., Ross, L., & Stephens, J. C. (2011). Who has a stake? How stakeholder processes influence partnership sustainability. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 4, 100-118.
Broschak, J. P. (2004). Managers’ mobility and market interface: The effect of managers’ career mobility on the dissolution of market ties. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(4), 608–640.
Clarke, L. (2021). “To educate and liberate?” Moving from coloniality to postcoloniality in the international branch campus model. Journal of Comparative and International Higher Education, 13(5).
Cross, R., Ernst, C., & Pasmore, B. (2013). A bridge too far? How boundary spanning networks drive organizational change and effectiveness. Organizational Dynamics, 42(2), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2013.03.001
Deese, J. J., Gokpinar-Shelton, E., & Wendling, L. A. (2018). International branch campuses: Reviewing the literature through Tierney’s organizational cultural framework. Journal of the Student Personnel Association at Indiana University, 2018, 89-102.
de Witt, J., Damhof, L., Oxenford, C., Schutte, I., & Wolfensberger, M. (2015). Global partnerships for intercultural learning. In A. S. Moore & S. Simon (Eds.), Globally networked teaching in the humanities: Theories and practices (pp. 79-92). Routledge.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Emery, F. E. (1967). The next thirty years: Concepts, methods, and anticipations. Human Relations, 20(3), 199-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872676702000301
Fear, F. A., & Sandmann, L. R. (2001). The “new” scholarship: Implications for engagement and extension. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 7(1-2), 29-38. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1097213.pdf
Garrett, R. (2018). International branch campuses: Success factors. International Higher Education, 93, 14-16. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.0.93.10417
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage.
Goldring, E., & Sims, P. (2005). Modeling creative and courageous school leadership through district-community-university partnerships. Educational Policy, 19(1), 223-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904804270777
Healey, N. (2015). Towards a risk-based typology for transnational education. Higher Education, 69(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9757-6
Healey, N. (2018). The optimal global integration-local responsiveness tradeoff for an international branch campus. Research in Higher Education, 59(5), 623-649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9480-0
Heyboer, K. (2019, March 30). Joining Big Ten could also bring Rutgers big academic benefits. NJ.com. https://www.nj.com/rutgersfootball/2012/11/joining_big_ten_could_also_bri.html
Honig, M. I., & Hatch, T. C. (2004). Crafting coherence: How schools strategically manage multiple, external demands. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 16-30. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008016
Human Rights Watch. (2021, June 30). “They don’t understand the fear we have.” https://www.hrw.org/report/2021/06/30/they-dont-understand-fear-we-have/how-chinas-long-reach-repression-undermines
Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008). Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies, and a research agenda. Higher Education, 56(3), 303-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9128-2
Jordan, J. W., Adams, K. R., & Mull, C. D. (2013). Boundary spanning roles in communities and organizations: Implications for adult educators [Paper presentation]. Adult Education Research Conference, St. Louis, MO, United States. https://newprairiepress.org/aerc/2013/symposia/1/
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Kearney, K. S., Naifeh, Z., Hammer, Y., & Cain, A. (2019). “Family” ties for foster alumni in college: An open systems consideration. Review of Higher Education, 42(2), 793-824. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0015
Knight, J. (2011). Education hubs: A fad, a brand, an innovation? Journal of Studies in International Education 15(3), 221-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315311398046
Lanford, M. (2019). John Henry Newman: The idea of a university. In J. Gossling, G. Fenwick, & G. Moore (Eds.), The literary encyclopedia: English writing and culture of the Victorian period, 1837-1901. The Literary Dictionary Company. https://www.litencyc.com/php/sworks.php?rec=true&UID=552
Lanford, M. (2020). Long term sustainability in global higher education partnerships. In A. Al-Youbi, A. Zahed, & W. G. Tierney (Eds.), Successful global collaborations in higher education institutions (pp. 87-93). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25525-1_9
Lanford, M. (2021). Institutional competition through performance funding: A catalyst or hindrance to teaching and learning? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(11), 1148-1160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1783246
Lanford, M., & Maruco, T. (2018). When job training is not enough: The cultivation of social capital in career academies. American Educational Research Journal, 55(3), 617-648. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217746107
Lanford, M., & Tierney, W. G. (2016). The international branch campus: Cloistered community or agent of social change? In D. Neubauer, J. Hawkins, M. Lee, & C. Collins (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of Asia Pacific higher education (pp. 157-172). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48739-1_11
Lanford, M., & Tierney, W. G. (2022). Creating a culture of mindful innovation in higher education. SUNY Press.
Laumann, E. O., Marsden, P. V., & Prensky, D. (1983). The boundary specification problem in network analysis. In R. Burt & M. Minor (Eds.), Applied network analysis (pp. 18-34). Sage.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Miller, P. M. (2008). Examining the work of boundary spanning leaders in community contexts. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 11(4), 353-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120802317875
Myers, M., & Bhopal, K. (2021). Cosmopolitan brands: Graduate students navigating the social space of elite global universities. British Journal of Sociology of Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2021.1941763
Oleksiyenko, A. V. (2019). Academic collaborations in the global marketplace. Springer.
Sandmann, L. R., Furco, A., & Adams, K. R. (2016). Building the field of higher education engagement: A 20-year retrospective. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 20(2), 1-14. https://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/jheoe/article/view/1243
Sandmann, L. R., & Plater, W. M. (2009). Leading the engaged institution. In L. R. Sandmann, C. H. Thornton, & A. J. Jaeger (Eds.), Institutionalizing community engagement in higher education: The first wave of Carnegie classified institutions (pp. 13-24). Jossey-Bass.
Sandmann, L. R., & Weerts, D. J. (2008). Reshaping institutional boundaries to accommodate an engagement agenda. Innovative Higher Education, 33(3), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-008-9077-9
Scott, W. R., & Davis, G. F. (2016). Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural, and open system perspectives (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Sharma, Y. (2021, September 1). Students, faculty angry over closure of Yale-NUS College. University World News. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20210901095937911
Shimauchi, S., & Kim, Y. (2020). The influence of internationalization policy on master’s education in Japan: A comparison of “super global” and mass-market universities. Higher Education Policy, 33(4), 689-709. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00204-y
Shrum, W. (1990). Status incongruence among boundary spanners - Structure, exchange, and conflict. American Sociological Review, 55(4), 496–511. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095803
Siltaoja, M., Juusola, K., & Kivijärvi, M. (2019). “World-class” fantasties: A neocolonial analysis of international branch campuses. Organization, 26(1), 75-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418775836
Tierney, W. G. (2021). Higher education for democracy. SUNY Press.
Tierney, W. G., & Lanford, M. (2015). An investigation of the impact of international branch campuses on organizational culture. Higher Education, 70(2), 283-298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9845-7
Tierney, W. G., & Lanford, M. (2016). Cultivating strategic innovation in higher education. TIAA Institute. https://www.tiaainstitute.org/publication/cultivating-strategic-innovation
Tierney, W. G., & Lanford, M. (2017). Between massification and globalization: Is there a role for global university rankings? In E. Hazelkorn (Ed.), Global rankings and the geopolitics of higher education (pp. 295-308). Routledge.
Tierney, W. G., Ward, J. D., Corwin, Z. B., Ngo, F., Cadena, M., Avilez, A. A., & Lanford, M. (2017). The university as a sanctuary. Pullias Center for Higher Education, University of Southern California. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED574550.pdf
Tierney, W. G., & Lanford, M. (2018a). Institutional culture in higher education. In J. C. Shin & P. N. Teixeira (Eds.), Encyclopedia of international higher education systems and institutions (pp. 1-9). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_544-1
Tierney, W. G., & Lanford, M. (2018b). Research in higher education: Cultural perspectives. In J. C. Shin & P. N. Teixeira (Eds.), Encyclopedia of international higher education systems and institutions (pp. 1-6). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_165-1
von Bertalanffy, L. (1950). An outline of general system theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1(2), 134-165. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/I.2.134
Walsh, P. (2019). Establishment of an American branch-campus model of higher education: Qatar’s early goals, rationales, and challenges. Athens Journal of Education, 64(4), 271-290. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.6-4-2
Wilkins, S. (2017). Ethical issues in transnational higher education: The case of international branch campuses. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1385-1400. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1099624
Xu, Z. (2021). Examining neocolonialism in international branch campuses in China: A case study of mimicry. Journal of Comparative and International Higher Education, 13(5).
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The findings, interpretations, conclusions, and views expressed in Journal of Comparative and International Higher Education (JCIHE) are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed in any manner to CIES, HESIG, or the sponsoring universities of the Editorial Staff. These works are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License. Readers are free to copy, display, and distribute articles that appear in JCIHE as long as the work is attributed to the author(s) and JCIHE, it is distributed for non-commercial purposes only, and no alteration or transformation is made in the work. All other uses must be approved by the author(s) or JCIHE. By submitting a manuscript, authors agree to transfer without charge the following rights to JCIHE upon acceptance of the manuscript: first worldwide serial publication rights and the right for JCIHE to grant permissions as its editors judge appropriate for the redistribution of the article, its abstract, and metadata associated with the article in professional indexing and reference services.