Internationalization Higher Education for What?
An Analysis of National Strategies of Higher Education Internationalization in East Asia
Keywords:Internationalization of higher education, national strategies, East Asia
This article examines national strategies on higher education internationalization in three East Asian countries: China, Japan, and South Korea. Specifically, through document analysis of five national educational documents since 2014, it examines what activities of higher education internationalization are underway and, more importantly, how nation states justify them. It finds that the three countries tend to associate internationalization with the countries’ global competitiveness and status. In addition, internationalization in the three countries focuses on regional cooperation, justified by its benefits for economic growth and national security. Drawing on the realist perspective in international relations, this article argues that internationalization of higher education at the national level in East Asia is instrumentalized to benefit national economic competitiveness and development and political security, while the important aspect of teaching and learning is overlooked.
Buckner, E. S. (2017). The changing discourse on higher education and the nation-state, 1960–2010. Higher Education, 74(3), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0056-2
Byun, K., & Kim, M. (2011). Shifting patterns of the government’s policies for the internationalization of Korean higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 15(5), 467–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315310375307
Hammond, C. D. (2016). Internationalization, nationalism, and global competitiveness: A comparison of approaches to higher education in China and Japan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(4), 555–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9459-0
Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: Definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 5–31.
McKinlay, R. D., & Little, R. (1986). Global problems and world order (Vol. 4, p. 89). Frances Pinter.
Sanders, J. S. (2018). National internationalisation of higher education policy in Singapore and Japan: Context and competition. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 7925, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2017.1417025
Waldow, F. (2018). Commentary to Part III: Why Is “Being International” So Attractive? “Being International” as a Source of Legitimacy and Distinction. In C. Maxwell, U. Deppe, H.-H. Krüger, & W. Helsper (Eds.), Elite Education and Internationalisation: From the Early Years to Higher Education (pp. 247–253). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59966-3_15
- 2021-02-05 (2)
- 2021-02-05 (1)
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The findings, interpretations, conclusions, and views expressed in Journal of Comparative and International Higher Education (JCIHE) are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed in any manner to CIES, HESIG, or the sponsoring universities of the Editorial Staff. These works are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License. Readers are free to copy, display, and distribute articles that appear in JCIHE as long as the work is attributed to the author(s) and JCIHE, it is distributed for non-commercial purposes only, and no alteration or transformation is made in the work. All other uses must be approved by the author(s) or JCIHE. By submitting a manuscript, authors agree to transfer without charge the following rights to JCIHE upon acceptance of the manuscript: first worldwide serial publication rights and the right for JCIHE to grant permissions as its editors judge appropriate for the redistribution of the article, its abstract, and metadata associated with the article in professional indexing and reference services.