Examining adult learners’ use of artificial intelligence for lifelong learning in Philippine higher education
An interdisciplinary empirical study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/jfrs6f53Keywords:
adult learners, artificial intelligence, lifelong learning, SEMAbstract
This interdisciplinary empirical study examined adult learners’ use of artificial intelligence (AI) for lifelong learning in Philippine higher education. Using a cross-sectional survey and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), the study found that Access and Inclusivity was the strongest predictor of AI use. Learning Experience and Engagement also had a significant positive relationship with AI use but contributed less than Access and Inclusivity to predicting adult learners’ AI use. The findings highlight the interdisciplinary nature of AI-supported lifelong learning across diverse learner contexts. The study implies that higher education institutions offering lifelong learning programs should prioritize equitable access to AI technologies to promote inclusive, accessible, and sustainable lifelong learning systems for adult learners.
References
Alblooshi, S. (2026). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Opportunities and challenges: A review.
Frontiers in Education, 10, 1683968. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1683968
AlDhaen, F. (2022). The use of artificial intelligence in higher education – Systematic review. In M. Alaali (Ed.), COVID-19 Challenges to university information technology governance (pp. 269-285) Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13351-0_13
Almasri F. (2024). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence in teaching and learning of science: A systematic review of empirical research. Research in Science Education, 54(5), 977–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10176-3
Al-Zahrani, A. M., & Alasmari, T. M. (2024). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on higher
education: The dynamics of ethical, social, and educational implications. Humanities and Social
Sciences Communications, 11, 912. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03432-4
Asio, J. M., & Soriano, I. D. P. (2025). The state of artificial intelligence (AI) use in higher education institutions (HEIs) in the Philippines. In F. D. Mobo (Ed.), Impacts of AI on students and teachers in education 5.0 (pp. 523–552). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-8191-5.ch019
Bećirović, S., Polz, E., & Tinkel, I. (2025). Exploring students’ AI literacy and its effects on their AI output quality, self-efficacy, and academic performance. Smart Learning Environments, 12, 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00384-3
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Bora, B. Y., & Kölemen, C. Ş. (2025). Integrating AI into instructional design: A case study on digital photography education in higher education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(3), ep583. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/16433
Caling, J. G., Antonio, J. K. T., Dimatactac, M. F. L., Sabellano, M. D., Vicencio, V. D. R., Prias, J. M., & Ramos, J. C. M. (2025). Pre-service teachers’ use of ChatGPT and acquired moral dissonance. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 14(4), 73–98. https://doi.org/10.32674/zmjq9089
Candy, P. C. (2002). Lifelong learning and information literacy,” White paper prepared for UNESCO, the U.S. National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, and the National Forum on Information Literacy. 2002. Retrieved from http://www.nclis.gov/libinter/infolitconf&meet/papers/candy-fullpaper.pd
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Dai, X., Wang, Y., Yu, J., Qiu, B., Wang, R., & Na, M. (2025). Motivation and engagement as pathways: How AI-augmented online assessment shapes English speaking competency in vocational EFL classrooms. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1730953
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dilinika, J. M. S. (2026). Factors influencing faculty decision-making on student use of generative AI in higher education. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 15(4), 107-134. https://doi.org/10.32674/ksb6gv95
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, K. A., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., & Wright, R. (2023). So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
European Commission. (2020). Digital education action plan (2021–2027): Resetting education and training for the digital age,” Publications Office of the European Union, 2020.
https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/digital-education/actions
Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171369704800103
Gervacio, J.L.M. (2026). Rewriting the rules: The Philippine AI roadmap and its transformative implications for higher education (Discussion Paper Series, No. 2026-10). UP Center for Integrative and Development Studies, Diliman, Quezon City.
Giray, L., De Silos, P.Y., Adornado, A., Buelo, R. J. V., Galas, E., Reyes Chua, E., Santiago, C., & Ulanday, M.L. (2024). Use and impact of artificial intelligence in Philippine higher education: Reflections from instructors and administrators. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 28(3), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2024.2352746
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Kim, J., Yu, S., Detrick, R., Lin, X., & Li, N. (2025). Designing AI-powered learning: Adult learners’
expectations for curriculum and human-AI interaction. Educational Technology Research and
Development, 73, 3397–3421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10549-z
Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2014). The adult learner (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315816951
Lim, T. P., & Teh, W. C. (2026). IT mindfulness and AI literacy shape lifelong learning orientation through student engagement and learning agency in AI-enhanced online learning. Discover Education, 5, 192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-01219-0
Long, D.Y., Wang, S., Md Rashid, S., & Lu, X. T. (2026). Artificial intelligence in higher education: A systematic review of its impact on student engagement and the mediating role of teaching methods. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1648661. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1648661
Mallary, K. J., Moore, E. J., & McClain, A. L. (2025). Artificial intelligence and universal design for learning: Transforming teaching and learning in adult and continuing higher education. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2025(188), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.70016
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, S. M. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
Polat, E. (2025). Artificial intelligence literacy, lifelong learning, and fear of innovation: Identification of profiles and relationships. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 20183–20214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13548-y
Pratiwi, H., Suherman, Hasruddin, & Ridha, M. (2025), Between shortcut and ethics: Navigating the use
of artificial intelligence in academic writing among Indonesian doctoral students. European
Journal of Education Research, Development, and Policy, 60, e70083.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70083
Rawas, S. (2024). ChatGPT: Empowering lifelong learning in the digital age of higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(6), 6895–6908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12114-8
Saflor, C. S. R. (2025). Modeling student acceptance of AI technologies in higher education: A hybrid SEM–ANN approach. Future Internet, 17(12), 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi17120581
Schmidt, D. A., Alboloushi, B., Thomas, A., & Magalhães, R. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence in higher education: Perceptions, challenges, and strategies for academic innovation. Computers and Education Open, 9, 100274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100274
Teoh, K. B. & Tan, W. L. (2026). Policy alignment and trustworthy AI governance in higher education: A conceptual analysis of Malaysia’s reform agenda and ASEAN governance imperatives. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 15(4), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.32674/eqphhh11
UNESCO. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54675/PCSP7350
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Vieriu, A. M., & Petrea, G. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on students’ academic development. Education Sciences, 15(3), 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030343
Villarino, R. T. (2025). Artificial intelligence (AI) integration in rural Philippine higher education: Perspectives, challenges, and ethical considerations. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 23. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.10909
Wang, K., Cui, W., & Yuan, X. (2025). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The impact of need satisfaction on artificial intelligence literacy mediated by self-regulated learning strategies. Behavioral Sciences, 15(2), 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020165
Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 252, 124167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167
Wang, W., Wang, Y., Chen, J., Wang, X., Zhang, H., Guo, C., & Peng, Y. (2025). The effectiveness of AI-supported personalized feedback on students’ learning outcomes and motivation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 64(3), 724-755. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331251410020
Younas, M., El-Dakhs, D. A., & Noor, U. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence-based learning tools in academic innovation: A review of Deepseek, GPT, and Gemini (2020-25) . Frontiers in Education, 10, 1689205. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1689205
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education: Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Felixberto M. Mercado, Joanne Rivera, Flormando P. Baldovino

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.




