Cultural Collaborative Ways of Knowing, Doing, Valuing and Becoming: A ‘Pandheri Guff’ Inquiry of Nepali Women Scholars
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/vbq7bv03Keywords:
Padheri Guff, higher education, dialogue, ways of knowingAbstract
In Nepal, women are facing challenges in academia due to gender biases and limited opportunities. This article explores the experiences of Nepali women scholars who are redefining traditional knowledge, which is typically confined to textbooks, notes, and lectures. These critical issues are often ignored in academic settings. However, women academicians can overcome these barriers by collaborating, reflecting on their experiences, and seeking innovative solutions. To this end, the authors introduce Pandheri Guff, a traditional Nepali method for discussing and addressing such issues. Subscribing Pandheri Guff as a method, the authors engaged in a cultural Nepali collaborative inquiry, combining their narratives to create meaning. Their virtual weekly meetings, which began during the COVID-19 pandemic, focused on reflections about class participation, assignments, and learning experiences over two months by documenting their insights in Google Docs. The analysis is categorized into four themes: believing, meditative, doubting, and dismantling ways of knowing. This method fosters a judgment-free environment for sharing experiences, enhancing their learning, and empowering them to transform themselves. This article argued that this cultural approach advances understanding of women’s knowledge acquisition and enhances higher education learning by providing a collaborative and reflective space to overcome gender biases and improve learning experiences
References
Acosta, D. A., Lautenberger, D. M., Castillo-Page, L., & Skorton, D. J. (2020). Achieving gender equity is our responsibility: leadership matters. Academic Medicine, 95(10), 1468-1471. www.sap2.org.ar/i2/archivos/1529.pdf
Aiston, S. J., & Fo, C. K. (2020). The silence/ing of academic women. Gender and Education, 33(2), 138-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2020.1716955
Ashton-Jones, E., Thomas, D. K., & Belenky, M. (1990). Composition, collaboration, and women's ways of knowing: A conversation with Mary Belenky. Journal of Advanced Composition, 275-292. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20865731
Banks, J. A. (1993). The canon debate, knowledge construction, and multicultural education. Educational researcher, 22(5),4-14. https://education.uw.edu/sites/default/files/people/faculty/banks/The%20canon%20debate,%20knowledge%20construction,%20and%20multicultural%20education.pdf
Barone, C., & Assirelli, G. (2020). Gender segregation in higher education: an empirical test of seven explanations. Higher Education, 79, 55-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00396-2
Belenky, M. F., & Stanton, A. V. (2000). Inequality, development, and connected knowing. Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress, 71-102.
Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1997).Women’s ways of knowing: the development of self, voice, and mind (10th anniversary ed). Basic Books.
Bonawitz, M., & Andel, N. (2009). The glass ceiling is made of concrete: The Barriers to promotion and tenure of women in American academia. In Forum on Public Policy Online (Vol. 2009, No. 2). Oxford Round Table. 406 West Florida Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ870462.pdf
Cortés, P., & Pan, J. (2020). Children and the remaining gender gaps in the labor market (No. w27980). National Bureau of Economic Research. www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w27980/w27980.pdf
Daneshfar, S., & Moharami, M. (2018). Dynamic assessment in Vygotsky's sociocultural theory: Origins and main concepts. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(3), 600-607. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0903.20
Delong, J. (2020). Raising Voices Using Dialogue as a Research Method for Creating living-educational-theories in Cultures of Inquiry. Educational Journal of Living Theories, 13(2). https://orcid.org/00000002-2408-0143
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. sage.
Donald, W. E., & Ford, N. (2023). Fostering social mobility and employability: the case for peer learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(3), 672-678. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2145467
Eagly, A. H., & Mitchell, A. A. (2004). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: Implications for the sociopolitical attitudes of women and men. In M. A. Paludi (Ed.), Praeger guide to the psychology of gender (pp. 183–206). Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-21898-009
Fung, Y. M. (2010). Collaborative writing features. RELC Journal, 41(1), 18-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688210362610
Jackson, L. (2017). Leaning out in higher education: A structural, postcolonial perspective. Policy Futures in Education, 15(3), 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210317708496
John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational psychologist, 31(3-4), 191-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1996.9653266
Kamin T, Vezovnik A. (2017). Slovenia’s socialist superwoman: feeding the family, nourishing the nation. Feminist Review, 117(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41305-017-0091-6
Keerthirathne, W. K. D. (2020). Peer learning: an overview. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Science, 4(11), 1-6. www.researchgate.net/profile/Dr-Keerthirathne/publication/355209445_Peer_Learning_an_Overview/links/616873f13851f9599407d660/Peer-Learning-an-Overview.pdf
LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices, Springer, Dordrecht, 817-869. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4020-6545-3_21
Lawrence, R. L., and Mealman, C. A. (1999). "Collaborative ways of knowing: Storytelling, Metaphor and the Emergence of the Collaborative Self," Adult Education Research Conference. https://newprairiepress.org/aerc/1999/papers/23
Locatelli, C. (2007). Women's ways of knowing: It is all about love! Organization, 14(3), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508407076148
Mercer, N., & Howe, C. (2012). Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learning, culture and social interaction, 1(1), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001
Mitchell, K. M. (2017). Academic voice: On feminism, presence, and objectivity in writing. Nursing inquiry, 24(4), e12200. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12200
Musaeus, P. (2005). The Dialogic Validation. Nyhedsbrev. Centre for Kvalitativ Metodeudvikling, (39), 28-33. https://pure.au.dk/portal/da/publications/the-dialogic-validation(91523660-b7ec-11da-bee9-02004c4f4f50).html
Novita, D., Kurnia, F. D., & Mustofa, A. (2020). Collaborative learning as the manifestation of sociocultural theory: teachers’ perspectives. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris (Exposure Journal 13), 9 (1), 13, 25.
Rocca, C. La, Margottini, M., & Capobianco, R. (2014) Collaborative Learning in Higher Education. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 61-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jss.2014.22009
Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Nauts, S. (2011). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008
Sandhya, S. J. (2015). Impact of education in women empowerment of in Bagalkot District, Karnataka. Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 4(2), 87-94. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=2022631c40cbf2347f29729f1f4512b5662e8408
Scager, K., Boonstra, J., Peeters, T., Vulperhorst, J., & Wiegant, F. (2016). Collaborative learning in higher education: Evoking positive interdependence. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), ar69. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-07-0219
Singh, K. (2016). Importance of education in empowerment of women in India. Motherhood International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Development, 1(1), 39-48. www.motherhooduniversity.edu.in/pdf/Publications/2016/Khushboo%20Singh.pdf
Singh, S., Sinha, K. L., & Agrawal, V. P. (2018). Empowering Women through Higher Education. ESSENCE Int. J. Env. Rehab. Conserv. IX (1), 17-22. http://doi.org/10.31786/09756272.18.9.2.203
Smith, B. L., & MacGregor, J. T. (1992). What is collaborative learning. Towards the Virtual University: International Online Learning Perspectives, 217-232. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jean-Macgregor/publication/242282475_What_is_Collaborative_Learning/links/53f279060cf2bc0c40eaa8be/What-is-Collaborative-Learning.pdf
Thorpe, H., Newman, J., Adkins-Cartee, M., Bayley, A., Fullagar, S., Markula, P., Nichols, E., Pavlidis, A., Rosiek, J., & Zarabadi, S. (2023). The special issue as diffractive process: A collaborative dialogue. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 23(2), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/15327086231154307
Van Manen, M. (2016). The tact of teaching: The meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315417134
Willink, K. G., & Jacobs, J. M. (2011). Teaching for change: Articulating, profiling, and assessing transformative learning through communicative capabilities. Journal of Transformative Education, 9(3), 143-164. http://jtd.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/02/21/1541344611436012
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2013). Biology or culture alone cannot count for human sex differences and similarities. Psychol. Inq. 24, 241-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2013.815034