Cultural Collaborative Ways of Knowing, Doing, Valuing and Becoming: A ‘Pandheri Guff’ Inquiry of Nepali Women Scholars

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32674/vbq7bv03

Keywords:

Padheri Guff, higher education, dialogue, ways of knowing

Abstract

In Nepal, women are facing challenges in academia due to gender biases and limited opportunities. This article explores the experiences of Nepali women scholars who are redefining traditional knowledge, which is typically confined to textbooks, notes, and lectures. These critical issues are often ignored in academic settings. However, women academicians can overcome these barriers by collaborating, reflecting on their experiences, and seeking innovative solutions. To this end, the authors introduce Pandheri Guff, a traditional Nepali method for discussing and addressing such issues. Subscribing Pandheri Guff as a method, the authors engaged in a cultural Nepali collaborative inquiry, combining their narratives to create meaning. Their virtual weekly meetings, which began during the COVID-19 pandemic, focused on reflections about class participation, assignments, and learning experiences over two months by documenting their insights in Google Docs. The analysis is categorized into four themes: believing, meditative, doubting, and dismantling ways of knowing. This method fosters a judgment-free environment for sharing experiences, enhancing their learning, and empowering them to transform themselves. This article argued that this cultural approach advances understanding of women’s knowledge acquisition and enhances higher education learning by providing a collaborative and reflective space to overcome gender biases and improve learning experiences

Author Biographies

  • Parbati Dhungana, Kathmandu University, Nepal

    PARBATI DHUNGANA, PhD, is an Assistant Professor at Kathmandu University School of Education, Nepal. She completed her PhD in 2022 and currently coordinates the Continuing and Professional Education Center (CPEC) at the School of Education. With over two decades of teaching experience ranging from kindergarten to university level, Dr. Dhungana has held multiple leadership roles and has been actively involved in curriculum planning and implementation in collaboration with various institutions since 2016. She has co-authored several textbooks, including those for Grades 9 and 10 English, and has published different journal articles and book chapters nationally and internationally. Her research interests include transformative professional development, gender-responsive curriculums, and participatory pedagogy. Her work is characterized by a multi-paradigmatic, multi-methodological approach, emphasizing community-based and arts-based educational perspectives. Email: parbati@kusoed.edu.np

  • Pushpa Kumari Sunar, Kathmandu University, Nepal

    PUSHPA KUMARI SUNAR is a Research Fellow and Visiting Faculty at the Kathmandu University School of Education. With 17 years of experience in the education sector of Nepal, she has been a leader and teacher educator, focusing on transformative education and art-based pedagogy. Coming from a marginalized community, Pushpa is deeply committed to using education to combat injustices. Her work includes research on innovative pedagogical approaches and participatory action research. She has co-authored several research articles and book chapters, contributing significantly to Nepal's education field. Email: pushpa_mpsteam22@kusoed.edu.np

  • Babita Maharjan, Kathmandu University, Nepal

    BABITA MAHARJAN is a Research Fellow and Visiting Faculty at Kathmandu University School of Education. She has contributed significantly to Nepal's education field, focusing on participatory learning and place-based pedagogy. Her research explores integrating indigenous knowledge into modern pedagogical practices to promote sustainable living and contextual learning. Ms. Babita has co-authored several research articles and book chapters and actively participates in national and international conferences. Email: babita_mpsteam22@kusoed.edu.np

  • Sachita Suwal, Kathmandu University, Nepal

    SACHITA SUWAL is a PhD Scholar at the Kathmandu University School of Education, Nepal. Her research focuses on the leadership skills of Early Childhood Development (ECD) teachers and their professional development, approached through a narrative inquiry. Ms. Suwal is dedicated to exploring innovative educational practices that enhance teacher effectiveness and student outcomes. Email: sachita_phdedl2023@kusoed.edu.np

  • Niroj Dahal, Kathmandu University, Nepal

    NIROJ DAHAL, PhD, is a lecturer in the Department of STEAM Education at Kathmandu University School of Education, Nepal. Dr. Dahal has been teaching both graduate and undergraduate students for over a decade. His research interests include ICT in education, qualitative research, transformative research, mathematics education, open, distance & e-learning, and STEAM education. Dr. Dahal has actively participated in and presented his research at over three dozen national and international conferences, workshops, and seminars. He has published editorials, articles, commentaries, book reviews, book chapters, and books in various national and international journals and publication presses. Dr. Dahal also serves as a managing editor for the Journal of Transformative Praxis. Email: niroj@kusoed.edu.np

References

Acosta, D. A., Lautenberger, D. M., Castillo-Page, L., & Skorton, D. J. (2020). Achieving gender equity is our responsibility: leadership matters. Academic Medicine, 95(10), 1468-1471. www.sap2.org.ar/i2/archivos/1529.pdf

Aiston, S. J., & Fo, C. K. (2020). The silence/ing of academic women. Gender and Education, 33(2), 138-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2020.1716955

Ashton-Jones, E., Thomas, D. K., & Belenky, M. (1990). Composition, collaboration, and women's ways of knowing: A conversation with Mary Belenky. Journal of Advanced Composition, 275-292. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20865731

Banks, J. A. (1993). The canon debate, knowledge construction, and multicultural education. Educational researcher, 22(5),4-14. https://education.uw.edu/sites/default/files/people/faculty/banks/The%20canon%20debate,%20knowledge%20construction,%20and%20multicultural%20education.pdf

Barone, C., & Assirelli, G. (2020). Gender segregation in higher education: an empirical test of seven explanations. Higher Education, 79, 55-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00396-2

Belenky, M. F., & Stanton, A. V. (2000). Inequality, development, and connected knowing. Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress, 71-102.

Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1997).Women’s ways of knowing: the development of self, voice, and mind (10th anniversary ed). Basic Books.

Bonawitz, M., & Andel, N. (2009). The glass ceiling is made of concrete: The Barriers to promotion and tenure of women in American academia. In Forum on Public Policy Online (Vol. 2009, No. 2). Oxford Round Table. 406 West Florida Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ870462.pdf

Cortés, P., & Pan, J. (2020). Children and the remaining gender gaps in the labor market (No. w27980). National Bureau of Economic Research. www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w27980/w27980.pdf

Daneshfar, S., & Moharami, M. (2018). Dynamic assessment in Vygotsky's sociocultural theory: Origins and main concepts. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(3), 600-607. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0903.20

Delong, J. (2020). Raising Voices Using Dialogue as a Research Method for Creating living-educational-theories in Cultures of Inquiry. Educational Journal of Living Theories, 13(2). https://orcid.org/00000002-2408-0143

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. sage.

Donald, W. E., & Ford, N. (2023). Fostering social mobility and employability: the case for peer learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(3), 672-678. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2145467

Eagly, A. H., & Mitchell, A. A. (2004). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: Implications for the sociopolitical attitudes of women and men. In M. A. Paludi (Ed.), Praeger guide to the psychology of gender (pp. 183–206). Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-21898-009

Fung, Y. M. (2010). Collaborative writing features. RELC Journal, 41(1), 18-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688210362610

Jackson, L. (2017). Leaning out in higher education: A structural, postcolonial perspective. Policy Futures in Education, 15(3), 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210317708496

John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational psychologist, 31(3-4), 191-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1996.9653266

Kamin T, Vezovnik A. (2017). Slovenia’s socialist superwoman: feeding the family, nourishing the nation. Feminist Review, 117(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41305-017-0091-6

Keerthirathne, W. K. D. (2020). Peer learning: an overview. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Science, 4(11), 1-6. www.researchgate.net/profile/Dr-Keerthirathne/publication/355209445_Peer_Learning_an_Overview/links/616873f13851f9599407d660/Peer-Learning-an-Overview.pdf

LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices, Springer, Dordrecht, 817-869. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4020-6545-3_21

Lawrence, R. L., and Mealman, C. A. (1999). "Collaborative ways of knowing: Storytelling, Metaphor and the Emergence of the Collaborative Self," Adult Education Research Conference. https://newprairiepress.org/aerc/1999/papers/23

Locatelli, C. (2007). Women's ways of knowing: It is all about love! Organization, 14(3), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508407076148

Mercer, N., & Howe, C. (2012). Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learning, culture and social interaction, 1(1), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001

Mitchell, K. M. (2017). Academic voice: On feminism, presence, and objectivity in writing. Nursing inquiry, 24(4), e12200. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12200

Musaeus, P. (2005). The Dialogic Validation. Nyhedsbrev. Centre for Kvalitativ Metodeudvikling, (39), 28-33. https://pure.au.dk/portal/da/publications/the-dialogic-validation(91523660-b7ec-11da-bee9-02004c4f4f50).html

Novita, D., Kurnia, F. D., & Mustofa, A. (2020). Collaborative learning as the manifestation of sociocultural theory: teachers’ perspectives. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris (Exposure Journal 13), 9 (1), 13, 25.

Rocca, C. La, Margottini, M., & Capobianco, R. (2014) Collaborative Learning in Higher Education. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 61-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jss.2014.22009

Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Nauts, S. (2011). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008

Sandhya, S. J. (2015). Impact of education in women empowerment of in Bagalkot District, Karnataka. Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 4(2), 87-94. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=2022631c40cbf2347f29729f1f4512b5662e8408

Scager, K., Boonstra, J., Peeters, T., Vulperhorst, J., & Wiegant, F. (2016). Collaborative learning in higher education: Evoking positive interdependence. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), ar69. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-07-0219

Singh, K. (2016). Importance of education in empowerment of women in India. Motherhood International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Development, 1(1), 39-48. www.motherhooduniversity.edu.in/pdf/Publications/2016/Khushboo%20Singh.pdf

Singh, S., Sinha, K. L., & Agrawal, V. P. (2018). Empowering Women through Higher Education. ESSENCE Int. J. Env. Rehab. Conserv. IX (1), 17-22. http://doi.org/10.31786/09756272.18.9.2.203

Smith, B. L., & MacGregor, J. T. (1992). What is collaborative learning. Towards the Virtual University: International Online Learning Perspectives, 217-232. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jean-Macgregor/publication/242282475_What_is_Collaborative_Learning/links/53f279060cf2bc0c40eaa8be/What-is-Collaborative-Learning.pdf

Thorpe, H., Newman, J., Adkins-Cartee, M., Bayley, A., Fullagar, S., Markula, P., Nichols, E., Pavlidis, A., Rosiek, J., & Zarabadi, S. (2023). The special issue as diffractive process: A collaborative dialogue. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 23(2), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/15327086231154307

Van Manen, M. (2016). The tact of teaching: The meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315417134

Willink, K. G., & Jacobs, J. M. (2011). Teaching for change: Articulating, profiling, and assessing transformative learning through communicative capabilities. Journal of Transformative Education, 9(3), 143-164. http://jtd.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/02/21/1541344611436012

Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2013). Biology or culture alone cannot count for human sex differences and similarities. Psychol. Inq. 24, 241-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2013.815034

Downloads

Published

2024-10-30