Revisiting Intersectionality: Theoretical Debates and Their Viability in the Indian Context

Authors

  • Suman Sahu University of Delhi, India
  • Anjali Chauhan University of Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32674/ddk7gx54

Keywords:

Intersectionalism, Dalit Feminism, Intersectionality, Caste, Viability

Abstract

Intersectionality, introduced within the Black feminist movement, gained momentum in feminist, sociological, and political identity-based discourses as a theoretical framework for its focus on women’s intersectional experiences of violence, often shaped by other dimensions of their identities, such as race and class. While the framework addresses social power structures and lived experiences, concerns have been raised due to its generalizability, ambiguity, and catch-all nature. This paper explores critical voices from India, questioning whether intersectionality remains a viable theoretical approach within Indian feminist discourse. It traces the contextual origin of this concept and its arrival and validity in the Indian context. The paper argues that women’s lived experiences should not be treated as universal; instead, they must be considered unique, shaped by various marginalized social identities that women embody. The paper contributes to ongoing debates about the relevance and adaptability of intersectionality in diverse cultural and sociopolitical landscapes.

Author Biographies

  • Suman Sahu, University of Delhi, India

    SUMAN SAHU, is a Doctoral Researcher at Department of Political Science, University of Delhi, India. Her research concerns locating Digital Literacy in Women’s Empowerment discourse. She likes to read, research and write on the themes of Digital Capitalism, State’s Surveillance and Interrelation of Gender & Digital Media Spaces. She is a Junior Research Fellowship awardee. Email - sumansahus314@gmail.com

     

  • Anjali Chauhan, University of Delhi, India

    ANJALI CHAUHAN is a Doctoral Researcher at Department of Political Science, University of Delhi, India. She is an ICSSR Centrally Administered Full Term Doctoral Fellowship awardee. Her specialization is in Feminist Political Economy and her research concerns analyzing the impact of Neoliberal Development on the women working as informal labourers. For the last 3+ years, her writings around Women, Labour and State Politics have been making space in acclaimed journals, websites and magazines such as Journal of Gender & Development, Outlook, Frontline, Newsclick, Quint, Forward Press, Kootniti, Diplomatist, Feminism In India, etc. Email - chauhananjali207@gmail.com

References

Ambedkar, B. R. (1946). Who Were the Shudras?: How They Came to be the Fourth Varna in the Indo-Aryan Society.

Chakravarti, U. (2018). Gendering Caste: Through a Feminist Lens. SAGE Publishing India.

Chauhan, A. (2023). Kiruba Munuswamy: progenitor of shockwaves in a casteist-pratriarchal society. Gender and Development, 31(1), 255–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2023.2184531

Crenshaw, K. W. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039

Dalit Women Talk Differently: A Critique of Difference and Towards a Dalit Feminist Standpoint Position. (2022, March 21). Economic and Political Weekly. https://www.epw.in/journal/1998/44/review-womens-studies-review-issues-specials/dalit-women-talk-differently-critique

Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as a buzzword. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700108086364

Guru, G. (1995). Dalit Women Talk Differently. Economic and Political Weekly. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4403327

Hooks, B., & Collective, S. E. P. (2007). Ain’t I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism.

John, M. (2015). Intersectionality: Rejection or Critical Dialogue?. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(33), 72-76.

Livemint. (2023, March 2). Hathras gang-rape case: A look at the timeline as UP court sets 3 accusedfreeMint. https://www.livemint.com/news/india/hathras-gang-rape-case-a-look-at-the-timeline-as-up-court-sets-3-accused-free-11677748908293.html

Menon, N. (2015). Is Feminism about “Women”? A Critical View on Intersectionality from India. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(17), 37–44. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24481823

McCall, L. (2005). The Complexity of Intersectionality. Signs, 30(3), 1771–1800. https://doi.org/10.1086/426800

Nash, J. (2008). Re-Thinking Intersectionality. Feminist Review, 89(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2008.4

Newsclick. (2022, August 31). NCRB Report Shows Rise in Atrocities Towards Dalits and Adivasis.NewsClick.https://www.newsclick.in/NCRB-Report-Shows-Rise-Atrocities-Towards-Dalits-Adivasis

Pritchett, F. (n.d.). Castes in India: Their Mechanism, Genesis, and Development, by Dr. B. R.Ambedkar.http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00ambedkar/txt_ambedkar_castes.html

Rege, S. (2006). Writing Caste, Writing Gender: Reading Dalit Women’s Testimonios.

Tripathi(2023).GaonConnection.GaonConnection. https://www.gaonconnection.com/lead-stories/crime-gender-ncrb-witch-craft-bihar-anti-dayan-law-women-52116

Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065752

Downloads

Published

2024-11-24