Revisiting Intersectionality: Theoretical Debates and Their Viability in the Indian Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/ddk7gx54Keywords:
Intersectionalism, Dalit Feminism, Intersectionality, Caste, ViabilityAbstract
Intersectionality, introduced within the Black feminist movement, gained momentum in feminist, sociological, and political identity-based discourses as a theoretical framework for its focus on women’s intersectional experiences of violence, often shaped by other dimensions of their identities, such as race and class. While the framework addresses social power structures and lived experiences, concerns have been raised due to its generalizability, ambiguity, and catch-all nature. This paper explores critical voices from India, questioning whether intersectionality remains a viable theoretical approach within Indian feminist discourse. It traces the contextual origin of this concept and its arrival and validity in the Indian context. The paper argues that women’s lived experiences should not be treated as universal; instead, they must be considered unique, shaped by various marginalized social identities that women embody. The paper contributes to ongoing debates about the relevance and adaptability of intersectionality in diverse cultural and sociopolitical landscapes.
References
Ambedkar, B. R. (1946). Who Were the Shudras?: How They Came to be the Fourth Varna in the Indo-Aryan Society.
Chakravarti, U. (2018). Gendering Caste: Through a Feminist Lens. SAGE Publishing India.
Chauhan, A. (2023). Kiruba Munuswamy: progenitor of shockwaves in a casteist-pratriarchal society. Gender and Development, 31(1), 255–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2023.2184531
Crenshaw, K. W. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
Dalit Women Talk Differently: A Critique of Difference and Towards a Dalit Feminist Standpoint Position. (2022, March 21). Economic and Political Weekly. https://www.epw.in/journal/1998/44/review-womens-studies-review-issues-specials/dalit-women-talk-differently-critique
Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as a buzzword. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700108086364
Guru, G. (1995). Dalit Women Talk Differently. Economic and Political Weekly. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4403327
Hooks, B., & Collective, S. E. P. (2007). Ain’t I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism.
John, M. (2015). Intersectionality: Rejection or Critical Dialogue?. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(33), 72-76.
Livemint. (2023, March 2). Hathras gang-rape case: A look at the timeline as UP court sets 3 accusedfreeMint. https://www.livemint.com/news/india/hathras-gang-rape-case-a-look-at-the-timeline-as-up-court-sets-3-accused-free-11677748908293.html
Menon, N. (2015). Is Feminism about “Women”? A Critical View on Intersectionality from India. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(17), 37–44. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24481823
McCall, L. (2005). The Complexity of Intersectionality. Signs, 30(3), 1771–1800. https://doi.org/10.1086/426800
Nash, J. (2008). Re-Thinking Intersectionality. Feminist Review, 89(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2008.4
Newsclick. (2022, August 31). NCRB Report Shows Rise in Atrocities Towards Dalits and Adivasis.NewsClick.https://www.newsclick.in/NCRB-Report-Shows-Rise-Atrocities-Towards-Dalits-Adivasis
Pritchett, F. (n.d.). Castes in India: Their Mechanism, Genesis, and Development, by Dr. B. R.Ambedkar.http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00ambedkar/txt_ambedkar_castes.html
Rege, S. (2006). Writing Caste, Writing Gender: Reading Dalit Women’s Testimonios.
Tripathi(2023).GaonConnection.GaonConnection. https://www.gaonconnection.com/lead-stories/crime-gender-ncrb-witch-craft-bihar-anti-dayan-law-women-52116
Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065752