A mixed-methods study of school students as trendsetters on co-designing 3D-printed kits for interdisciplinary STEM education

Authors

  • Sufi Adriana Saiful Akla Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia
  • Afiqah Umairah Faizal Azli Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia
  • Nur Allesya Hana Khairul Anhar Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia
  • Mohd Shaiful Sajab Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • Fadzidah Mohd Idris Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia
  • Hatika Kaco Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32674/8fm2hb34

Keywords:

3D printing, gifted students, mixed methods, peer mentoring, STEM education, student as trendsetter

Abstract

Secondary students in Malaysia turn away from STEM partly because the curriculum content is abstract and disconnected from real life. This mixed-methods study evaluated a Student-as-Trendsetter framework in which 10 gifted students codesigned 3D-printed STEM kits and mentored 88 peers. The classroom participants highly rated the peer-led sessions (M = 4.14–4.57), including the trendsetters’ expertise (M = 4.35). The trendsetters’ self-rated technical competency decreased significantly after the project (from 4.30–4.90 to 1.80–3.00; p < .001). Reflective journals showed that this decline was a healthy recalibration: moving from digital design to physical fabrication exposed real engineering constraints and built grounded, resilient confidence. The framework offers a low-cost route to engaging in student-led STEM learning.

Author Biographies

  • Sufi Adriana Saiful Akla, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia

    SUFI ADRIANA SAIFUL AKLA, is a secondary school students at Kolej PERMATA Insan, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Malaysia. Her research interests lie in the area 3D printing in education. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9516-9805.

  • Afiqah Umairah Faizal Azli, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia

    AFIQAH UMAIRAH FAIZAL AZLI, is a secondary school students at Kolej PERMATA Insan, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Malaysia. Her research interests lie in the area 3D printing in education. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9115-8283.

  • Nur Allesya Hana Khairul Anhar, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia

    NUR ALLESYA HANA KHAIRUL ANHAR, is a secondary school students at Kolej PERMATA Insan, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Malaysia. Her research interests lie in the area 3D printing in education. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9165-7137.

  • Mohd Shaiful Sajab, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

    MOHD SHAIFUL SAJAB, Ph.D is an associate professor at the Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia. His research focuses on sustainable materials in 3D printing applications. His work entends to 3D-printed educational tools. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8400-8090.

  • Fadzidah Mohd Idris, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia

    FADZIDAH MOHD IDRIS, Ph.D. is a senior lecturer at Kolej PERMATA Insan, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Malaysia. Her major research interests lie in the areas of Nanotechnology and current study in polymer composite 3D printing focusing on Electromagnetic Wave Absorber and STEM education. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6630-7281

  • Hatika Kaco, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia

    HATIKA KACO, Ph.D., is a senior lecturer at Kolej PERMATA Insan, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia. Her major research interests lie in the areas of Materials Science and current study in polymer 3D printing and 3D printing in education. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8359-9359.

References

Abu Hassan, M. H., Kaco, H., Mohd Noor, K., Mohd Alwi, N. H., Othman, S. S., Md Jusoh, S. N., & Muzaffar, N. A. Z. (2025). STEM-focused green service learning: Enhancing interactive learning and sustainability with INAQ. Journal of Islamic Social Sciences and Humanities, 32(2).

Belcheva, K. I. (2024). Learners as digital content creators in educational settings. In Proceedings of the ELARA Conference: Techniques & Technologies to Support Sustainable Education in the Academic Sphere (Book 2, Vol. 2, pp. 78–87).

Bhardwaj, V., Zhang, S., Tan, Y. Q., & Pandey, V. (2025). Redefining learning: Student-centered strategies for academic and personal growth. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1518602. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1518602

Bhatt, B. S. (2026). What drives active learning engagement in school education: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.32674/0ad5ck56

Chong, S., Pan, G. T., Chin, J., & Show, P. L. (2018). Integration of 3D printing and Industry 4.0 into engineering teaching. Sustainability, 10(11), Article 3960. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113960

Dawkins, R., & Naidu, K. (2026). A surprising problem that emerges for humanities academics teaching STEM to communication students. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 15(4), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.32674/mqa8rk82

Deming, D. J., & Noray, K. (2020). Earnings dynamics, changing job skills, and STEM careers. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(4), 1965–2005. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjaa021

Faizal Azli, A. U., Khairul Anhar, N. A. H., Kaco, H., Sajab, M. S., Mohd Idris, F., Mohamad Jan, N., & Mohd, S. M. (2024). Crafting mathematical minds by engaging Braille-tangible 3in1 3D printed geoboards module for visually impaired children. Semarak International Journal of Fundamental and Applied Mathematics, 1(1), 1–12.

Foi, L. Y., & Kean, T. H. (2022). STEM education in Malaysia: An organizational development approach? International Journal of Advanced Research in Future Ready Learning and Education, 29(1), 1–19.

Gamal, M., Ibrahim, O. A., Hamed, H. F. A., & Abd-Elnaby, S. F. M. (2024). Engineering’s next leap: How Fourth Industrial Revolution is shaping the future of the industry. ERU Research Journal, 3(2), 970–992. https://doi.org/10.21608/erurj.2024.245917.1086

Hisyam, I. M., Salleh, M. F. M., & Nasir, N. A. M. (2019). The issues and challenges in empowering STEM on science teachers in Malaysian secondary schools. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(13), 430–444.

Izharruzzahir, N. N., Khairil Anhar, K. I. B., Abdu Rahman, T. N., Mohd Idris, F., Sajab, M. S., & Kaco, H. (2026). Bridging the gap in STEM education by visualizing physics concepts with 3D printing. Journal of Advanced Research in Social and Behavioural Sciences, 43(1), 183–192.

Jin, R., Narayanan, G., Majid, S., & Lin, C. (2024). Exploring the application of mind map to enhance students’ creative thinking. International Journal of Service Management and Sustainability, 9(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.24191/ijsms.v9i2.24210

Kakarla, U. (2024). Fostering creativity in education. International Journal of Innovative Scientific Research, 2(3), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.5281/ijisr140724

Kayan-Fadlelmula, F., Sellami, A., & Abdelkader, N. (2022). A systematic review of STEM education research in the GCC countries: Trends, gaps and barriers. International Journal of STEM Education, 9, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00319-7

Khadka, J., Joshi, D. R., Khanal, B., & Adhikari, K. P. (2026). Effect of learners’ self-efficacy on their learning performance at secondary schools in Nepal. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.32674/0m98t215

Klimecká, E. (2023). Advantages and disadvantages of being ‘gifted’: Perceptions of the label by gifted pupils. Research Papers in Education, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2022.2065523

Klimecká, E. (2024). Educational strategies leading to labeling the gifted pupil. The Curriculum Journal, 35(2), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.222

Minh, Đ. (2026). AI-assisted learning and the illusion of competence: Measuring the AI-learning gap through random knowledge verification. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 15(4), 45–82. https://doi.org/10.32674/nrmwyw65

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2026). Ringkasan Eksekutif Rancangan Pendidikan Malaysia 2026-2035 Ringkasan Eksekutif Rancangan Pendidikan Malaysia 2026-2035. https://www.moe.gov.my/dokumen-ringkasan-eksekutif-rancangan-pendidikan-m

Mohd Rozi, N. S., Hamdan, M. N., Mohd Naim, A. M., Sajab, M. S., & Kaco, H. (2025). Physicochemical properties of reforming the recycled biobased polylactic acid (PLA) filament into film-liked shape. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3271(1), Article 060016. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0218765

Munir, M. T., Jamwal, P. K., Li, B., Carter, S., & Hussain, S. (2025). Revolutionising engineering pedagogy: The role of 3D printing in modern engineering education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62(2), 575–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2346554

Noreen, G. D., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2025). In their own voice: Educational perspectives from intellectually precocious youth as adults. Gifted Child Quarterly, 69(4), 307–332.

Palpanadan, S. T., & Ravana, V. (2022). Future trajectories in teaching-learning practices for STEM education in Malaysian secondary schools: A scoping review. Asia Proceedings of Social Sciences, 9(1), 169–170.

Parmar, J. S., Mistry, S. K., Micheal, S., Dune, T., Lim, D., Alford, S., & Arora, A. (2025). Peer support for improving student engagement and learning outcomes in postgraduate public health and health sciences: A qualitative study. Education Sciences, 15(5), Article 602. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050602

Pokhrel, V. (2022). From textbooks to beyond textbooks in English class: An action research study. Journal of Transformative Praxis, 3(1), 40–58. https://doi.org/10.51474/jrtp.v3i1.577

Rumjaun, A., & Narod, F. (2025). Social learning theory—Albert Bandura. In B. Akpan & T. J. Kennedy (Eds.), Science education in theory and practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81351-1_5

Saat, R. M., & Fadzil, H. M. (2022). Enhancing STEM education in Malaysia through scientist–teacher–student partnerships (STSP). In M. M. H. Cheng, C. Buntting, & A. Jones (Eds.), Concepts and practices of STEM education in Asia (pp. 125–142). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2596-2

Shahali, E. H. M., Ismail, I., & Halim, L. (2017). STEM education in Malaysia: Policy, trajectories and initiatives. Asian Research Policy, 8(2), 122–133.

Stager, G. S. (2025). Papert, parables, and the future of constructionism: A constructionist call for action. Constructionism Conference Proceedings, 8, 427–436. https://doi.org/10.21240/constr/2025/82.X

Tabassum, R., Iqbal, S., Haneef, A., Yaseen, M., Tahira, R., Rasheed, K., Taj, S., & Ahmed, M. (2024). Impact of STEM education on creativity of university students. Kurdish Studies, 12(5), 673–678. https://doi.org/10.53555/ks.v12i5.3299

Tejera, M., Galiç, S., & Lavicza, Z. (2025). 3D modelling and printing in teacher education: A systematic literature review. Journal for STEM Education Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-025-00147-2

To, T. T., Al Mahmud, A., & Ranscombe, C. (2024). Opportunities and challenges of 3D printing integration into engineering education in developing countries. Educational Technology & Society, 27(4), 191–217. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202410_27(4).RP11

Ukoba, K., Yoro, K. O., Adeoye, A. E., Ampah, J. D., Yusuf, A. A., Samuel, F. O., Ikelegbe, O. E., & Jen, T. C. (2025). Additive manufacturing in the energy sector and the fourth industrial revolution. Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 10, 4625–4645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-024-00931-3

Valquaresma, A. (2024). Creativity, agency and meaning-making: Unfolding developmental possibilities in twenty-first-century learning environments. In A. Valquaresma, L. Dantas de Paula, & T. K. Rodney (Eds.), Creativity and learning (pp. 85–104). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-73393-2_5

Widiana, D. R., Syafiuddin, Sriwijayasih, I., Aju, I. R., Praharsi, Y., & Novianarenti, E. (2025). The use of the Wilcoxon signed rank test in analyzing the difference in test scores before and after digital marketing training. Jurnal Teknologi Maritim, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.35991/jtm.v8i2.73

Worrell, F. C., Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Dixson, D. D. (2019). Gifted students. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 551–576. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102846

Additional Files

Published

2026-10-30

Issue

Section

Education, Technology, and Scientific Innovation

How to Cite

Saiful Akla, S. A., Faizal Azli, A. U. ., Khairul Anhar, N. A. H., Sajab, M. S. ., Mohd Idris, F. ., & Kaco, H. (2026). A mixed-methods study of school students as trendsetters on co-designing 3D-printed kits for interdisciplinary STEM education. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 15(8). https://doi.org/10.32674/8fm2hb34